Back

Incremental Clinical Value of Single-Molecule Nanopore Sequencing in Thalassemia Testing: A Prospective Double-blind, Multicenter Study

Xiang, J.; Zhu, B.; Xu, H.; Chen, Y.; Sun, X.; xiang, r.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, W.; Zhang, L.; He, J.; liu, j.; Chen, Y.; Fan, Z.; Zhang, H.; Tan, J.; Pang, L.; Shi, L.; Kong, Y.; Cai, A.

2026-06-09 hematology
10.64898/2026.06.09.26354559 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Thalassemia is one of the most common monogenic disorders worldwide, current screening strategies combining hematological testing with molecular assays still carry a risk of missed diagnoses and undesirable efficiency, particularly for complex structural variants and rare mutations. Methods In this prospective double-blind, multicenter cohort study of 3,842 participants (3,362 pregnant women and 480 male partners), we conducted a head-to-head comparison to systematically evaluate the incremental clinical value and detection performance of single-molecule nanopore sequencing in thalassemia (SMITH) against conventional hematological testing and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Findings The overall concordance rate between NGS and SMITH was 98.6% (3789/3842). The discrepant cases (n=53) were directly attributed to the superior detection capabilities of SMITH, which successfully identified complex structural rearrangements-including 45 -globin gene triplications and four HK alleles-that were missed by NGS. Furthermore, SMITH accurately detected four rare variants (c.134_135insT/, c.-22(C>T)/, {beta}N/{beta}c.316-290delinsAGGGCAATAATTT and {beta}3.5 kb deletion/{beta}N ) and resolved ten trans and three cis configurations within the globin gene allele. Clinically, these technical advantages translated to a 9.3% (5/54) increase in the detection rate of high-risk prenatal couples, effectively preventing one birth affected by moderate-to-severe thalassemia. Additionally, SMITH corrected a diagnostic discrepancy in one case (HK vs. -3.7), sparing the couple from an unnecessary invasive procedure. Interpretation Our findings demonstrate that SMITH provides a powerful platform for resolving globin gene rearrangements, detecting rare variants, and enabling direct haplotype phasing. By effectively eliminating diagnostic blind spots, SMITH is expected to become an optimal method for thalassemia prevention programs. Funding This study was supported by Chinese National Natural Science Foundation Projects 81760037 and 82271894.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
3
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
5
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
6
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
7
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
9
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
11
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
12
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.4%
18
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
19
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
BioTechniques
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
30
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%