Reliability-weighted target-position estimation in a musculoskeletal arm model: adaptive priors and learned source weighting under violations of fixed-precision assumptions
Kobayashi, J.
Show abstract
Reliability-weighted integration is a normative account of cue combination, but its scope in musculoskeletal models and conditions requiring adaptive or learned extensions remains unclear. We studied target-position estimation in a MyoSuite arm within a field-wise architecture representing vision, proprioception, forward prediction, and a task prior. Target-position experiments combined vision, forward prediction, and, where applicable, the task prior by precision weighting; proprioception informed other state fields. At the open-loop state-estimate level, a trusted but wrong prior biased the target estimate more as visual reliability decreased, and a false visual cue was followed under low noise and discounted under high noise; both effects followed the bias{approx} w {middle dot} offset pattern. Across trials, an adaptive prior tracked shifts in the target mean, while variance tracking reduced the prior weight as the target spread increased. A learned softmax integrator met the prespecified parity criterion relative to precision weighting for calibrated Gaussian synthetic observation channels and improved estimation when reported variance was miscalibrated, or channel errors were biased, heavy-tailed, or correlated. On target-position observations from two held-out MyoSuite rollout seeds, improvements under prediction miscalibration and injected visual outliers were directionally consistent across seeds during offline replay. The MSE benefit in the outlier regime reflected regime-level source weighting rather than consistent per-trial outlier detection. These results define a computational boundary: precision weighting was sufficient in the calibrated conditions tested here, whereas adaptive statistics or learned source weighting became useful when assumptions changed or failed. Evidence from the arm model is limited to target-position estimates; endpoint propagation remains unresolved.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensory uncertainty punctuates motor learning independently of movement error when both feedforward and feedback control processes are engaged 95%
- Feeling lucky? Prospective and retrospective cues for sensorimotor confidence 95%
- Perturbation Variability Does Not Influence Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A very fast time scale of human motor adaptation: within movement adjustments of internal representations during reaching 95%
- Time-to-target simplifies optimal control of visuomotor feedback responses 95%
- Dissociable effects of urgency and evidence accumulation during reaching revealed by dynamic multisensory integration 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.