Back

SPARK: A Systems-level Computational Framework for Reconstructing Transcriptomic State Organisation in Lung Adenocarcinoma

Kulkarni, R.; Sengupta, A.; Kumar, R.

2026-06-11 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.08.730929 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) exhibits substantial molecular heterogeneity, which complicates tumour stratification and limits the ability of mutation-centric models to capture tumour behaviour and predict patient outcomes. This study investigates whether coordinated transcriptomic programs can provide a systems-level representation of tumour states. Bulk RNA-sequencing data from the TCGA-LUAD cohort were analysed to reconstruct pathway-level transcriptomic organisation using a stability-optimised network framework (SPARK). This analysis identified eight transcriptomic modules representing coordinated biological processes active across tumours. Module activity scores were subsequently used to derive a composite Transcriptomic Risk Score through elastic-net Cox proportional hazards modelling. The resulting risk score showed a significant association with overall survival in the discovery cohort and improved prognostic discrimination beyond clinical variables. An independent evaluation in the CPTAC-LUAD cohort confirmed the prognostic signal and preserved risk stratification across patient groups. Unsupervised clustering of module activity further revealed three transcriptomic patient groups characterised by distinct biological programs, genomic alteration patterns, and survival outcomes. Single-cell analysis also demonstrated that the identified transcriptomic modules reflect coordinated organisation of the tumour-immune-stromal ecosystem across cellular compartments. Together, these findings suggest that LUAD heterogeneity can be organised into coordinated transcriptomic programs with measurable clinical relevance, providing a systems-level framework for representing tumour molecular states.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 8%
18.5%
2
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
7.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.3%
5
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.0%
7
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
9
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
10
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
11
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.9%
13
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
14
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
15
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
16
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
18
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
19
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
20
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
29
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.6%
30
British Journal of Anaesthesia
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%