Back

Clonal dynamics deviate from neutral drift in zebrafish spermatogenesis

Weber, J. M.; Shrader, C. R.; Shapiro, D. B.; Truong, K. T.; Sposato, A. L.; Adler, F. R.; Gagnon, J. A.

2026-06-11 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.06.08.730911 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) maintain male fertility, but how their clonal dynamics change with age remains poorly understood. Here, we use in vivo CRISPR barcoding in zebrafish to label SSCs and track their contributions to sperm production through monthly sampling across the fertile lifespan. We find that only a subset of embryonic germ cells contributes to adult sperm production and that the relative contributions of individual clones shift dramatically over time. To interpret these dynamics, we developed a mathematical model that quantifies clonal drift rates and formally tests neutral versus non-neutral hypotheses. Most SSC clones show significant evidence of drift, yet their dynamics are inconsistent with a neutral model where clones have equal fitness and their dynamics are driven solely by random chance. Instead, we observe heterogeneous clonal dynamics, including a positive relationship between clone size and drift rate. Together, these findings demonstrate that SSC clonal dynamics are non-neutral across the zebrafish reproductive lifespan with important implications for allele transmission.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
37.7%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Development
● 497 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.9%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.0%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 9%
5.2%
Similar papers in this journal
5
GENETICS
◐ 483 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.9%
7
PLOS Genetics
● 862 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.1%
8
Developmental Biology
○ 150 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
9
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
◐ 252 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Biology Open
● 156 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
11
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.3%
12
Current Biology
○ 665 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.0%
13
Genome Research
● 468 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
14
Molecular Ecology
○ 336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
PLOS Biology
● 486 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
16
Life Science Alliance
● 285 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
17
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.1%
18
Developmental Cell
○ 196 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Molecular Biology and Evolution
◐ 542 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
BMC Biology
○ 265 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
21
Genes & Development
● 90 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%
23
Developmental Dynamics
○ 56 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.