Back

Cross-cue reconstruction of perceived 3D object structure from human visual cortex

Aoki, S. C.; Tsukasa, R.; Yang, S.; Tanaka, M.; Doi, E.; Nakamura, T.; Ho, J.-K.; Kamitani, Y.

2026-06-11 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.08.730830 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The human brain assembles three-dimensional (3D) percepts from qualitatively different depth cues, yet the perceived 3D structure that the brain builds--a representation shared across cues--has remained difficult to measure directly. Here, we show that this cue-invariant 3D structure can be externalized as explicit 3D objects from human brain activity: fMRI responses are decoded into the latent features of a pretrained 3D point-cloud autoencoder, and a generator then maps these features back to a point cloud. A decoder trained exclusively on responses to 2D rendered objects passed three increasingly stringent tests: (i) it generalized to novel object categories; (ii) it generalized across depth cues to random dot stereograms (RDSs), which evoke 3D percepts through binocular disparity but share no pictorial shape information with the training images; and (iii) it tracked the 3D slant of contour-matched RDSs whose 2D outlines were held identical but whose disparity-defined slants varied, indicating that the reconstruction reflected depth-defined geometry rather than object category or image outline. Cross-cue generalization was strongest in higher visual areas, particularly along the dorsal stream. These results indicate that cross-cue generalization can serve as a criterion for externalizing perceived 3D structure and open a route toward reading out internal 3D representations that go beyond the momentary retinal input and could support predictions of how the world would appear under different viewpoints--a step toward externalizing the brains internal world model.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.