Back

Daily symptom monitoring is sustainable over months: retention, not compliance, is the primary barrier to long-duration digital tracking

Gunsilius, C. Z.; Pei, P.; Carayannopoulos, A.; Petzschner, F. H.

2026-06-10 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.06.08.26355180 medRxiv
Show abstract

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) enables real-time, longitudinal measurement of symptoms and behavior via smartphones, yet nearly all feasibility evidence comes from protocols lasting one to two weeks, far shorter than the timescales over which chronic diseases fluctuate and clinical decisions unfold. Whether daily compliance can be sustained over months, or whether it decays as short-protocol trends predict, is unknown. Here, 214 participants (173 with pain, 41 healthy controls) completed a 4-month (122-day) EMA protocol via the Soma smartphone app, generating 26,907 check-ins. Half the sample completed the full protocol without a two-week lapse. Aggregate compliance appeared moderate (50%), but this conflated two distinct phenomena: when recomputed over each participant's active period, compliance rose to 71%, with 91% achieving moderate-to-high adherence, and remained stable across all 17 study weeks. Pain status predicted earlier disengagement but not lower compliance among those who remained; after adjustment for differential retention, group differences disappeared. To our knowledge, this is the longest continuous daily EMA evaluation in a clinical population. It suggests the primary barrier to long-duration EMA is not declining motivation among active participants but concentrated early disengagement, with direct implications for the design of digital health protocols, decentralized trials, and remote symptom monitoring.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.4%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.9%
7
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
8
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
9
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
10
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
12
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
14
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.1%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
16
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
17
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
18
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
19
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
20
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
24
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.6%
26
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%