Back

Prescription intervals of medications for chronic use: a cohort study

Muddiman, R.; Donoghue, P.; Gomez Lemus, J.; Doherty, A. S.; Boland, F.; McCarthy, C.; Moriarty, F.

2026-06-09 primary care research
10.64898/2026.06.08.26355164 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose In deprescribing studies, a prescription-free gap is typically used to determine if patients discontinued their treatment. An appropriate gap depends on the typical time between prescriptions during continued use. This work aims to characterise the interval between prescriptions of chronic drugs using different methods for a cohort of older people in primary care in Ireland. Methods The empirical prescription interval was analysed for 38,154 patients for the twenty most common drug classes and the association between covariates and the interval was analysed using a multi-level model. Estimates were also compared to those obtained from the parametric waiting time distribution (pWTD) approach. Results Available covariates had consistent relationships with prescription intervals across drug classes. For example, each additional prescription issue was associated with an increase in the interval by 5.0 (NSAIDs) to 19.7 days ("Other antidepressants"). Full public health cover was associated with a -29.0 day (inhaled adrenergics) to -11.0 day (opioids) change relative to partial cover, while other/private cover had a -17.9 day (benzodiazepines and associated drugs) to -7.1 day (SSRI and SNRIs) change relative to partial cover. The pWTD also produced consistent estimates of the population interval for most drugs. Conclusions The interval varied substantially within drug classes, due to a mixture of patient, practice and unmodelled factors. Variation between practices was effectively explained, with residual variation between patients and within patients. The pWTD approach is useful for describing complex distributions of intervals, and may be more appropriate for inferring a gap than summarising truncated data.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.9%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
11.9%
4
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
7
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
8
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
10
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
11
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
13
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
14
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
15
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
17
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
20
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%