Back

Utilising Artificial Intelligence to Identify Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Targets in Sinus Rhythm

Wang, X.; Mayer, J.; Dennis, A.; Chow, A.; Al-Sheikhli, J.; Siang, R.; Winter, J.; O'Shea, C.; Dhanjal, T.; Lambiase, P.; Orini, M.

2026-06-16 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.08.26354989 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and Aims: Machine learning has shown potential in predicting ablation targets for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in an animal model. This study progresses to externally validating deep learning approaches for human data. Methods: The development and external validation dataset included 21 and 13 patients, respectively, with structural VT undergoing catheter ablation. In the development datasets, electrophysiological studies were conducted using the AdvisorTM HD grid (EnsiteTM X), while both CARTO and Ensite Precision were used in the validation dataset. In each patient, VT ablation targets were defined as mapping points within 8 mm of VT isthmuses. Three advanced machine learning models were trained using cardiac mapping data acquired in both omnipolar and unipolar configurations during sinus rhythm and ventricular pacing. Discrimination was evaluated using nested leave-one-out cross-validation at patient level. Results: Overall, graph convolutional networks (GCNs), which integrate intracardiac signal waveforms with three-dimensional electroanatomical geometries, achieved the highest performance, with optimal results obtained from unipolar electrograms acquired in sinus rhythm (median AUC 0.793, sensitivity 83.6%, specificity 69.0%). This may be partly explained by the inclusion of repolarization dynamics in unipolar electrograms and the higher point density of sinus rhythm maps. Comparable performance was observed in the external dataset. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that graph convolutional networks applied to sinus rhythm EGM waveforms collected during substrate mapping can localise critical components of VT re-entry circuits. This approach has potential to provide fast and accurate ablation guidance without the need to induce and map VT, improving safety and efficacy of VT catheter ablation.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Heart Rhythm
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
2
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
3
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
5
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.6%
7
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.2%
8
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
10
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
11
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
13
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
15
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
16
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
17
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
21
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
25
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.6%
27
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%