Back

Assessment of the accuracy of lung lesions diagnosis in adolescents with osteosarcoma using artificial intelligence

Uskova, N. G.; Gombolevskiy, V. A.; Chernina, V. Y.; Burenchev, D. V.; Akhaladze, D. G.; Panina, E. V.; Karachunskiy, A. I.; Tereschenko, G. V.; Goncharov, M. Y.; Soboleva, E. A.; Konopleva, E. I.; Bydanov, O. I.; Plekhov, S. Y.; Grachev, N. S.

2026-06-10 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.06.08.26354011 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. Lung metastases in osteosarcoma (OS) are the main cause of the death. The accuracy of the diagnosis of nodules by computed tomography (CT) of the lungs is critically important for determining the disseminated stage of the disease and planning surgical treatment. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the search for lung nodules increases the accuracy of diagnosis and reduces the chance of missing metastases. Objective: to evaluate the accuracy of lung nodules diagnosis in adolescents with OS using AI. Methods. A retrospective assessment of CT scans of adolescents with OS was performed. A pathological nodule with an average size of [≥]4 mm was considered a target finding. The diagnostic accuracy of an AI algorithm previously trained on an adult dataset was evaluated, and the number of false positives (FP) and false negatives (FN) was determined. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under the ROC curve (AUC), positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F1-measure were calculated. Based on the obtained results, the effectiveness of the algorithm was assessed. Results. 248 CT scans of adolescents with OS were evaluated. The following results were obtained: in 5 cases, the AI algorithm showed a FP result (2.02%), in 34 cases, it showed a FN result (13.71%), and in 209 cases, a correct result (both true positive and true negative) (84.27%). The diagnostic accuracy of the algorithm was 0.843 (95% CI 0.794-0.887). The application of the AI algorithm in the practice of an X-ray doctor in a specific clinical task would allow to increase the sensitivity from 0.805 to 0.891, while ensuring an absolute decrease in the number of FN results by 8.59% and a relative decrease by 44%. Conclusion. The obtained results confirm the practical value of the application of the AI algorithm and justify the implementation of AI-assisted systems in the diagnostic protocols for lung metastases in adolescents with OS.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.3%
3
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
5
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
7
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Bone
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
12
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
13
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
19
Virology Journal
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
20
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
21
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
JBMR Plus
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.5%
29
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%