Sensor Geometry, Not Signal Processing, Limits Opportunistic Detection of Capillary-Refill-Like Signals by Rule-Based and Language-Model Methods in Archived ICU Waveforms

Background. Capillary refill time is a resuscitation target in septic shock,1-4 but bedside measurement is examiner-dependent. An ICU monitor co-records a photoplethysmogram on the pulse oximeter and intermittent noninvasive blood pressure cuff cycles; if the probe and the cuff share a limb, each cycle is an unplanned vascular occlusion test on the distal microvascular bed. Standard practice places the two on opposite limbs. Objective. To measure how often, in MIMIC-IV-WDB v0.1.0, charted cuff cycles show the photoplethysmographic morphology expected of a same-limb cuff and probe, and to characterize the candidate capillary refill-like signal when that morphology is present. Methods. MIMIC-IV-WDB v0.1.05 was linked to the MIMIC-IV clinical database.6 A pre-registered rule-based detector identified candidate occlusion-reperfusion signatures on the 1-Hz perfusion-index envelope around each charted cuff timestamp. The primary endpoint was the proportion of cuff cycles suitable for analysis that were detector-positive at a 15-second reperfusion threshold, with 95% confidence intervals estimated by resampling patients at a fixed seed. A secondary analysis used a locally hosted multimodal language model (a Gemma-3 derivative on a non-device server) to adjudicate the same signature on perfusion-index plots; no MIMIC-IV-WDB content left the workstation. Results. Of 9,224 charted cuff cycles, 8,909 had a usable pulse-oximeter waveform, and 268 cycles in 15 patients (4.30% of the 6,236 cuff cycles suitable for analysis, 95% CI 2.60 to 6.03) met the primary 15-second threshold. The language model adjudicated the same cycles and called 1,367 of the 8,909 cycles with a usable waveform (15.34%) signature-present, roughly five times the detectors count. Because no laterality ground truth exists, agreement with a single blinded reader served as the comparator rather than accuracy. The two methods were about equally concordant with the reader: precision was 0.25 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.39) for the detector and 0.24 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.35) for the language model, although reweighting to the full population of cycles with a usable waveform lowered the language model to 0.030 (95% CI 0.009 to 0.053). These estimates are reference-limited: a blinded re-read of a 150-card subsample showed only moderate intra-rater reliability (Cohen {kappa} 0.46 to 0.59) with systematic undercalling on the first pass, and rescoring against the corrected re-read roughly doubled precision for both methods. Conclusions. Opportunistic extraction of capillary refill-like signals from archived ICU pulse oximetry is limited in two distinct ways. First, sensor geometry limits how often the signal is recordable: cuff cycles rarely show the morphology expected of a same-limb cuff and probe pair, consistent with opposite-limb placement, so the bottleneck is geometry rather than signal processing. Second, the modest reliability of morphology adjudication limits how well any single flagged cycle can be confirmed: against a blinded reader the detector is a usable screen but a noisy confirmer, the reference is itself only moderately reliable, and the language model is no more concordant despite flagging many more cycles. The minority of cycles in which the morphology appears contain a candidate signal that may merit prospective study under controlled placement with laterality recorded.