Back

Comparative Evaluation of Mosquito Repellent Products in South Asia and North America: Efficacy, Safety, and Public Health Implications

Sahal, K.; Amin, S. M. A.; Mostafa, T.; Wang, S.; Colucci, B.; Shafoyat, M. U.; Yuan, Z. -m.; Cheng, G.

2026-06-08 toxicology
10.64898/2026.06.07.26355094 medRxiv
Show abstract

Mosquito-borne diseases continue to pose significant public health challenges worldwide, particularly in densely populated regions of South Asia and parts of North America experiencing increasing vector prevalence due to climate and environmental changes. Commercial mosquito repellents are widely used as a primary preventive measure; however, their efficacy, safety, and public health impacts vary depending on formulation, active ingredients, environmental conditions, and user practices. This study presents a comparative evaluation of commonly used mosquito repellent products in South Asia and North America, including coils, vaporizers, sprays, creams, and Natural repellents. The research aims to assess repellent efficacy against major mosquito vectors, evaluate potential health and respiratory effects associated with prolonged exposure, and analyze consumer awareness and usage patterns across different regions. Laboratory-based efficacy testing and field observations were conducted to compare protection duration, repellency rate, and environmental performance under varying climatic conditions. Safety assessments included analysis of chemical composition, indoor air quality impact, and reported adverse health symptoms among users. The findings indicate significant differences in effectiveness and safety profiles among product categories and geographical regions. Synthetic repellents generally demonstrated higher repellency duration, while herbal formulations showed improved safety and environmental compatibility. The study highlights the importance of standardized evaluation protocols, regulatory oversight, and public awareness in promoting safe and effective mosquito control strategies. These findings may support policymakers, healthcare professionals, and manufacturers in improving mosquito repellent technologies and reducing the burden of mosquito-borne diseases globally.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
19.6%
2
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.6%
3
Parasites & Vectors
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.6%
4
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
5
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.1%
6
Journal of Medical Entomology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.8%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.9%
9
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
10
NeuroToxicology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
11
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
12
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
14
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
16
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
18
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
25
Acta Tropica
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%