Does ECG-Based AI Detect Aortic Stenosis Beyond Conventional LVH Criteria? An Analysis of the CLIDAS Database
Shimada, T.; Kodera, S.; Sawano, S.; Guan, J.; Saitoh, W.; Wakasa, S.; Ito, S.; Yanagishita, T.; Hayashi, Y.; Shibata, A.; Ito, A.; Otsuka, K.; Higashikuni, Y.; Okamura, H.; Tsujita, K.; Node, K.; Yamaguchi, O.; Makimoto, H.; Kabutoya, T.; Imai, Y.; Nakayama, M.; Sato, H.; Fujita, H.; Kohro, T.; Matoba, T.; Takeda, N.; Fukuda, D.; Nagai, R.
Show abstract
Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive valvular disease associated with poor prognosis once symptoms develop, yet routine echocardiographic screening is impractical. While artificial intelligence (AI)-based electrocardiogram (ECG) models have shown promise for AS detection, it remains unclear whether they primarily reflect conventional left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) voltage criteria or capture additional ECG features. Methods and Results: We developed a deep learning model using 244,816 ECGs from 51,713 patients across six academic institutions in Japan (CLIDAS database). AS labels were derived from inpatient Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) codes. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.849 (95% confidence interval 0.832-0.865) in the independent test cohort, with consistent performance across institutions, sex, and age. At a threshold of 0.1, sensitivity was 79.1%, specificity was 73.9%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 98.0%. Conventional LVH voltage criteria (Sokolow-Lyon AUC 0.706; Cornell AUC 0.692) showed lower performance, and adding them to the AI model conferred no incremental benefit (AUC 0.849 vs. 0.847). Gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) revealed predominant attention around QRS complexes in limb leads, beyond regions typically assessed in LVH evaluation. Conclusions: This multicenter AI-ECG model demonstrated strong discrimination for AS and captured ECG features beyond conventional LVH voltage criteria. The high NPV supports its use as a rule-out pre-screening tool.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.