Back

Hill-Based Reformulation of the Hodgkin-Huxley Model for Interpretable Neuronal Excitability

Saab, B.; Fahs, J.; Daou, A.

2026-06-10 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.06.730614 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Conductance-based models of neuronal excitability depend critically on the mathematical form used to describe voltage-dependent ion channel gating. The classical Hodgkin-Huxley (HH) formalism employs empirically derived rate expressions fitted to squid giant axon data that are not readily transferable across cell types or interpretable in terms of measurable gating properties. Here we introduce a Hill-based reformulation of the HH model in which steady-state sodium and potassium activation curves and the sodium inactivation rate are recast using Hill-type sigmoidal functions, a biologically motivated family widely used to describe cooperative and saturating processes in enzyme kinetics, gene regulation, and receptor binding. Systematic benchmarking against four compact sigmoid alternatives demonstrates that Hill functions provide superior fits to the original HH-derived gating data across all three targets. The resulting hybrid model reproduced canonical spike waveforms and frequency-current behavior, preserving the broad input-output organization of the original model. Importantly, the reformulation linked specific gating parameters to firing regimes and spike features, revealing how shifts in activation, inactivation, and steepness can systematically reshape excitability phenotypes. By making the relationship between channel kinetics and neuronal output more transparent, this framework provides an interpretable route for adapting conductance-based models to cell-specific excitability and channel-dependent changes in neural function.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
33.3%
2
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
3
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
4
Biological Cybernetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
9
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
10
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
11
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
12
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.7%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.7%
16
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
17
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
19
Journal of General Physiology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.8%
22
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.6%