Back

Foraging behavior, not prey identity, facilitates niche packing in a tropical montane avifauna

Drucker, J. R.; Lele, A.; Fidino, M.; Maddox, D.; Picq, S.; Bonaccorso, E.; Bates, J.

2026-06-08 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.06.730573 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding the mechanisms of key ecological and evolutionary patterns and the restructuring of biodiversity in the Anthropocene is contingent on filling knowledge gaps about resource consumption across trophic levels and how resource use is limited by factors intrinsic to organisms and extrinsic aspects of the environment across deep and shallow timespans. We quantified diet composition and foraging behavior across a community of invertivorous birds in the Ecuadorian Andes to explore how resource use facilitates the packing and expansion of niche space across an elevational gradient, contributing the tropical Andes status as the most species-rich region on earth. We found evidence that niche packing of morphologically similar species may be offset by greater behavioral plasticity in foraging behavior at species-rich lower elevations where competition is likely more intense and invertebrate prey more diverse. We also tested the extent to which the breadth and similarity of birds foraging and dietary niches are shaped by the environmental and competitive gradient across elevation versus species identity and phylogenetic similarity. The specific behaviors and substrates that birds used were far more strongly associated with species identity than elevation, particularly for behaviors requiring specialized morphology that is phylogenetically conserved. In contrast, species identity had little effect on prey selection, which was more strongly associated with elevation. Our findings suggest that elevational range dynamics and niche packing of tropical montane birds are more strongly shaped by phylogenetic constraints on foraging behavior than by specializing on specific prey taxa, highlighting the importance of maintaining structural integrity in tropical forests for preserving functional diversity.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
2
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
3
Biotropica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
4
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
5
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.0%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.6%
7
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
8
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
9
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
11
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
12
Journal of Avian Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
14
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
15
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.6%
17
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
18
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
19
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
20
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
21
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
22
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
23
Biodiversity and Conservation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
24
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
26
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
27
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
28
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
29
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
30
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%