Back

Real-world safety profile of Enfortumab Vedotin: A comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

Xu, Q.; Wang, S.; Sun, H.; Wei, X.; Zhong, J.; Cai, J.

2026-06-09 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.64898/2026.06.06.26355060 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate real-world adverse event (AE) signals of EV to provide evidence-based guidance for its safe clinical application. Methods: Data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from the period of 2019 Q1-2025 Q3 were analyzed. Disproportionality analysis algorithms, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM), were utilized to mine safety signals.The time to onset (TTO) was evaluated using the Weibull distribution model. Results: Among 11,697,906 reports, 4,177 EV-treated patients experienced 14,511 AEs. The most common System Organ Classes (SOCs) were skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (18.23%), general disorders and administration site conditions (13.17%).Multi-algorithm consensus identified 179 positive signals. Alongside known toxicities (rash, peripheral neuropathy, hyperglycemia), potential new signals emerged, including dysgeusia, atypical skin lesions, and myelosuppression. Median TTO was 14 days, with the Weibull {beta} of 0.736, confirming an "early failure" profile. Subgroup analysis revealed toxicity heterogeneity: patients aged [&ge;]65 and females exhibited stronger signals for fatal severe cutaneous adverse reactions, while patients aged < 65 and males showed higher susceptibility to neurological and metabolic toxicities. Conclusions: The real-world safety profile of EV confirms known toxicities, reveals new risks (e.g., dysgeusia), and shows toxicity concentrated in the first treatment cycle. Clinical practice requires proactive monitoring during the first two weeks using demographic-specific strategies: vigilance for fatal skin toxicity in elderly and female patients, and close follow-up of neurological and metabolic indicators in younger and male populations.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.0%
2
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
4
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
5
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
7
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
8
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.6%
10
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.2%
12
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
13
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
14
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
15
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
16
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
17
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
19
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%