Title: Development of a Human Papillomavirus genotype-informed risk-stratification model to improve Cervical Cancer screening in resource-limited settings: a cross-sectional study
Kambou Kountchou, K. D. K. K.; Tommo Tchouaket, M. C.; Moko Fotso, L. G.; Fokou Bomgning, B. N.; Fippo Fitime, L.; Talom Teumadjou, A.; Routoube, M.; Efakika Gabisa, J.; Ngoufack Jagni Semengue, E.; Nka, A. D.; Kae, A. C.; Dobgima Pisoh, W.; Deutou, L.; Takou, D.; Fainguem, N.; Sosso, S. M.; Kamgaing Simo, R.; Yagai, B.; Tabola Fossa, L.; Perno, C.-F.; Colizzi, V.; Enow-Orock, G.; Fokam, J.; Terrinoni, A.; Kuiate, J.-R.
Show abstract
Background: In resource-limited settings, a critical bottleneck in cervical cancer prevention is the lack of practical strategies to triage high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV)- positive women. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and internally validate a genotype-specific risk stratification model. Methods: A cross-sectional study enrolled 555 women in Cameroon. Data collection integrated cervical cytology and HPV genotyping using Abbott m2000rt and Sacace multiplex systems. An iterative modeling approach with bootstrap validation was used to develop the model and address model instability. HR-HPV genotypes were transformed into a hierarchical risk variable due to sparsity and integrated with significant predictors. The final model was translated into a scoring system, and the risk gradients and performances were evaluated at two thresholds. Data was analyzed using SPSS 27.0. Results: The mean age was 44.8 years, and the prevalence of HR-HPV was 26.5% (147/555). The final model, incorporating HPV categories, age, and tobacco, demonstrated moderate discriminative ability (AUC=0.702, 0.642-0.762) with a good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow {chi}{superscript 2}=4.05, p=0.399). The scoring system assigned women to risk groups based on their total scores which produced a clear monotonic risk gradient; the observed probability of high-grade lesions/cancer ranged from 15% (score 0) to >65% (score [≥]4). At a conservative threshold ([≥]4 points), 4.7% (26/555) of women were classified as high-risk, concentrating 46% (6/13) of cancers (positive predictive value[PPV]=58%) while a sensitive threshold ([≥]3 points) had 16.8% (93/555) high-risk, concentrating 77% (10/13) cancers (PPV=38%). Both thresholds maintained a high negative predictive value (>95%). Conclusion: This bootstrap-validated, risk-stratification tool is a proof-of-concept in resource limited settings that assigns HR-HPV-positive women to distinct management pathways using three variables. After refining through a longitudinal study and external validation, this scoring system can improve the efficiency of cervical cancer screening programs in low-resource settings.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Frequent PIK3CA mutations in eutopic endometrium of patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma 90%
- Tissue contamination challenges the credibility of machine learning models in real world digital pathology 89%
- Artificial Intelligence for Advance Requesting of Immunohistochemistry in Diagnostically Uncertain Prostate Biopsies 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Assessment of p16/Ki-67 Dual Staining Technology for Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Living with HIV (COMPASS-DUST) – Study Protocol 95%
- Reasons for non-attendance to cervical cancer screening and acceptability of HPV self-sampling among Bruneian women: A cross-sectional study 95%
- Comparison of Self-Collected Vaginal Swabs and First-Void Urine for Detection of Human Papillomavirus in Sexually Active Girls and Women in Three South Asian Countries 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying the impact of introducing the HPV vaccine in 2006 on 25-29-year-old cervical cancer incidence in 2022 93%
- Penetrance of breast cancer genes from the eMERGE III Network 90%
- Relation of Quantitative Histologic and Radiologic Breast Tissue Composition Metrics with Invasive Breast Cancer Risk 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NILS study protocol - a retrospective validation study of a preoperative decision-making tool for non-invasive lymph node staging in women with primary breast cancer [ISRCTN14341750] 90%
- A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses 90%
- Integrating clinical factors and parity-specific models with molecular biomarkers to better predict the risk of preterm birth in asymptomatic women 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lymphoid Enhancer-Binding Factor 1 (LEF1) immunostaining as a surrogate of β-catenin ( CTNNB1) mutations 91%
- Outcome of radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion associated with epithelial proliferations with atypia diagnosed on breast core biopsy - Results from a multicentric UK based study 90%
- Macrophage polarization in cesarean scar diverticulum 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.