Back

Genotype is a predictor of blood pressure variability and relative systemic hypertension risk in sickle cell disease

Bowers, A. S. A.; Henry, K.; McConnell, B.; Francis, C.; Thaxter-Nesbeth, K.

2026-06-10 hematology
10.64898/2026.06.06.26355049 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Blood pressure (BP) regulation in individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) is influenced by a complex interplay of genetic and physiological factors. While SCD has traditionally been associated with lower BP, there is an increased risk of hypertension. Emerging BP research suggests significant heterogeneity across genotypes, age groups, and sex. Objectives: This study investigated the longitudinal effects of population-level characteristics and continuous clinical and laboratory predictors on systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in individuals with SCD, with emphasis on the interactions between baseline and predicted blood pressure slopes over time. Methods We retrospectively analyzed longitudinal data from a cohort of 2,739 patients with diverse SCD genotypes. Descriptive statistics were documented across sex, age range, genotype, health status and relative systemic hypertension risk categories (rHTN-risk). Linear mixed-effects models provided estimates of fixed- and random-effects of baseline BP and of time-related BP effects, respectively. Post-estimation margins provided contrasts of baseline-adjusted BP means and of pre-specified time effects on BP patterns. Results Males had significantly higher baseline SBP ({beta} = 6.64, p < 0.001) but lower baseline DBP ({beta} = -2.61, p < 0.001) compared with age-matched HbSS females. Baseline SBP was more unstable compared with baseline DBP and baseline DBP was more predictive of future BP trends than baseline SBP. Genotype was a consistent predictor of DBP (p < 0.05), but not of SBP. Similarly, we observed increased risks of relative diastolic hypertension across most genotypes, while the prevalence and magnitude of systolic hypertension was lower across all genotype compared with HbSS. Conclusions Blood pressure trajectories in SCD patients are not uniform and are significantly related to genotype, age group and sex over time. Baseline diastolic levels were less heterogenous and exhibited clear upward trajectories over time. These findings support the need for patient-specific BP surveillance in the care and management of SCD.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.4%
3
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.4%
6
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
9
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
12
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
13
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
15
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
16
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
18
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
21
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%