Flexible neural encoding predicts the comprehension of degraded speech
MacIntyre, A. D.; Goehring, T.; Davis, M. H.
Show abstract
How listeners track a variable and continuous acoustic speech signal and parse it into meaningful linguistic representations is a question central to cognitive neuroscience. Moreover, the resilience of this process to acoustic signal degradation is not fully understood. The current study consists of a listening task wherein participants (n = 38) were presented with a naturalistic story whilst undergoing continuous electroencephalography (EEG). Critically, we manipulated access to speech information over two independent dimensions: Spectral clarity, which ranged from unprocessed to severely spectrally degraded; and language, which was either English, spoken by the participants, or Dutch, an incomprehensible language that is closely related to English. All stimuli were produced by the same bilingual speaker. We applied banded regression to model the neural response to a set of acoustic and linguistically derived features. We found that there is no single speech feature for which neural encoding reliably predicted speech understanding in individual listeners or conditions. Yet, differences in feature weights between experimental conditions can be combined into a composite score that strongly predicted individual subjective comprehension of spectrally degraded but linguistically accessible speech in data from held-out participant. Hence, the manner in which neural encoding flexibly adapts to listening context is associated with advantageous perceptual strategies for degraded speech. These findings underscore the complex interplay between low- and high-level features during speech listening and illustrate inter-condition differences in the neural encoding of these properties. Our results highlight natural variation within and between individuals in the encoding of acoustic and linguistic features which provides a potential pathway towards individualised assessment of clinical populations.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Attentional engagement with target and distractor streams predicts speech comprehension in multitalker environments 98%
- Linguistic structure and meaning organize neural oscillations into a content-specific hierarchy 98%
- General auditory and speech-specific contributions to cortical envelope tracking revealed using auditory chimeras 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Delta/theta band EEG differentially tracks low and high frequency speech-derived envelopes 98%
- Cross-modal interactions at the audiovisual cocktail-party revealed by behavior, ERPs, and neural oscillations 97%
- The integration of continuous audio and visual speech in a cocktail-party environment depends on attention 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Are you talking to me? How the choice of speech register impacts listeners' hierarchical encoding of speech. 98%
- Neural signatures of automatic letter-speech sound integration in literate adults 96%
- Distinct roles of SNR, speech Intelligibility, and attentional effort on neural speech tracking in noise 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- More than Words: Neurophysiological Correlates of Semantic Dissimilarity Depend on Comprehension of the Speech Narrative 97%
- Neural tracking of the speech envelope predicts binaural unmasking 97%
- Musical prediction error responses similarly reduced by predictive uncertainty in musicians and non-musicians 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.