Back

Top Model Decision Tree: Selecting Segmentation Models for Reliable Quantitative Analysis in Low- and Ultralow-Dose CryoEM

Massenburg, L. N.; Madugula, S. S.; Brown, S. R.; Bible, A. N.; Harris, C. R.; Zhang, L. X.; Parker, K.; Retterer, S. T.; Morrell-Falvey, J. L.; Vasudevan, R. K.; Williams, A. N.

2026-06-06 microbiology
10.64898/2026.06.05.730486 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Deep learning neural networks provide a powerful approach for segmenting low-contrast cryogenic electron microscopy (cryoEM) images. However, model performance can vary significantly across imaging conditions and may hinder downstream quantitative analyses. Here, we present a structured evaluation workflow to systematically screen segmentation models based on performance, inference speed, robustness across imaging conditions, and reliability of downstream quantitative measurements. Using the Bacterial Cell Envelope Thickness Tool (BCET) as a test case, we evaluate multiple architectures (YOLOv11, YOLO26, U-Net, Detectron2, and SAM3) under low-dose and ultralow-dose cryoEM conditions. While several models achieve high metrics, model choice strongly influences downstream measurements of envelope thickness. Models optimized for high F1-scores may produce unreliable segmentation masks from object crowding, interpolation artifacts or imaging conditions. Our results reveal distinct trade-offs between performance, speed, and robustness amongst models. YOLOv11 provides the highest fidelity membrane segmentation for quantitative measurements and the Meta-based model SAM3 offers improved robustness under ultralow-dose conditions with competitive inference performance. This work provides practical guidance for model selection in cryoEM workflows, emphasizing that optimal choice depends on experimental priorities and downstream analysis requirements rather than metrics alone. These findings are broadly relevant to cryoEM workflows as AI-based analysis expands beyond the biological sciences. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=142 SRC="FIGDIR/small/730486v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (33K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f29df4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@601d6eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2c5023org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1413f76_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Structural Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.6%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 11%
9.1%
3
Journal of Structural Biology: X
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 26%
5.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 19%
5.0%
6
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.5%
7
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
8
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Microscopy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
10
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
npj Imaging
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.0%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.9%
15
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
16
Journal of Visualized Experiments
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
17
IUCrJ
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
20
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
22
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
23
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
24
Microscopy and Microanalysis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
25
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
26
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
28
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.6%
29
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
89 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%