Back

Deciphering the limitations of immortalized hepatocyte cell lines for the study of liver cis-regulatory elements

Bellesis, A.; Li, X.; Moore-Frederick, D.; Xu, D.; Delbridge, K.; Ma, J.; Vaccaro, G.; Edward, B. A. A.; Kellogg, M.; Creeger, Y.; Okamoto, A. S.; Kaplow, I. M.

2026-06-09 genomics
10.64898/2026.06.05.730479 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Immortalized cell lines are widely used in biological research despite their known differences from their tissues and cell types of origin. Such cell lines are especially popular for testing hypotheses regarding the activity of cis-regulatory elements (CREs) that regulate gene expression. Previous investigations of blood and skin cell lines revealed many differences between the transcriptional regulatory networks of the cell lines and the associated primary cells. Similar comparisons for other tissues have been limited. Here, we used ATAC-seq to profile CREs in four immortalized liver cell lines and found many differences between each cell lines CREs and primary liver tissue, including differences in the transcription factors that are likely to bind them and differences in the genes that they are likely to regulate. Modifying cell culture conditions based on recommendations in the literature did not improve the similarity with primary liver tissue. Our results suggest that differences between the transcriptional regulatory networks in cell lines and primary tissue should be considered when designing and interpreting cell line experiments.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
2
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.7%
4
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 15%
5.5%
6
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.2%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
9
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
11
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
13
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
17
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
19
Molecular Genetics and Genomics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
20
The FEBS Journal
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
23
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
24
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
25
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Biochimie
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
27
BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
28
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.6%
29
RNA
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Toxicological Sciences
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%