Stepwise Evolution and Epistatic Interaction of Driver Mutations from Endometrial Hyperplasia to Carcinoma
Summers, M.;Glasmacher, K.;Asmelash, S.;Mandell, J.;Fisk, N.;Townsend, J.;Cannataro, V.
Show abstract
To characterize early oncogenesis, pathologically identified pre-cancerous tissue can be analyzed for the presence of cancer drivers. Here, we argue that in such studies, analyses of the driver status of variants, of the association between step-specific prevalence and progression through tumorigenesis, and of driver co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity should be accompanied by estimates of inherent mutation rate of variants and presented within an evolutionary framework of selective epistasis. To illustrate this point, we examine the transition of endometrial tissue from atypical hyperplasia to carcinoma. We apply a step-specific analysis, demonstrating that the strength of selection on somatic driver mutations promoting cell division and survival differs between hyperplasia to carcinoma. We demonstrate that mutations of PTEN, which are highly prevalent in carcinomas and have been argued to exert substantial driver effects, exhibit an even larger effect of increasing cellular division and survival within developing hyperplasias. A determination of cooccurrence or mutual exclusivity may be a product of genes sharing or differing in underlying sources of mutation, as opposed to a product of biological interaction and selection. By accounting for tumor-specific mutational processes that influence co-occurrence, we calculate epistatic selective intensities between pairs of drivers. Mutations of KRAS and FGFR2 are often mutually exclusive and were indeed found to exhibit significant antagonistic selective epistasis. However, mutations of PIK3CA and PIK3R1, which also have been identified as showing mutual exclusivity, do not demonstrate significant antagonistic selective epistasis. Thus, evidence of mutually exclusivity is insufficient to determine epistasis. Accordingly, the application of quantitative approaches that distinctly analyze mutation and selection on cancer variants has the potential to substantially illuminate the trajectory of tumorigenesis and cancer progression.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of promoter-associated chromatin interactions reveals biologically relevant candidate target genes at endometrial cancer risk loci 92%
- Heterogeneity in signaling pathway activity within primary and between primary and metastatic breast cancer 91%
- APC Mutation marks an aggressive subtype of BRAF mutant colorectal cancers 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pervasive duplication of tumor suppressors in Afrotherians during the evolution of large bodies and reduced cancer risk 90%
- The protective effect of aspirin in colorectal carcinogenesis: a multiscale computational study from mutant evolution to age incidence curves 90%
- Molecular portraits of colorectal cancer morphological regions 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Time-resolved, integrated analysis of clonally evolving genomes 90%
- Meiotic, genomic and evolutionary properties of crossover distribution in Drosophila yakuba 89%
- A survey of human cancer-germline genes: linking X chromosome localization, DNA methylation and sex-biased expression in early embryos 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.