Back

One operator to rule them all: Unifying connectome harmonics, turbulence and complex harmonics in brain dynamics

Kringelbach, M. L.; Deco, G.

2026-06-09 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.05.730423 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Brain dynamics can be described in three different convenient mathematical languages, namely connectome harmonics, turbulence and complex harmonics (CHARM). Here we demonstrate that these theoretical frameworks can be rigorously unified, under the functional calculus, as one self-adjoint operator and its single spectral measure. The connectome Laplacian carries that measure; the harmonics are its spectral projections, the turbulence smoothing kernel is its resolvent, and the CHARM form is its unitary propagator. The bridge that makes this exact is a textbook fact: The exponential distance rule, which is the empirical kernel of the turbulence model, is the Greens function of a screened Laplacian, so the local order parameter is the phase field passed through the resolvent of the same operator whose eigenfunctions are the harmonics. A single shared control parameter, the spectral gap, simultaneously yields the cortical hierarchy, the turbulent information cascade and the structured interference the CHARM form measures. This unification makes a strong predictive claim. If the harmonic projections, the turbulence resolvent and the CHARM propagator really are three functions of one operator, then any structural perturbation that re-tunes the operator must move all three signatures in unison and must do so with a single coupling. We test this prediction with a pharmacological perturbation by lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), which is known to change the emotional state, by empirically perturbing the operator with a 5-HT2A receptor density map and asking whether one scalar coupling can simultaneously predict the multi-scale turbulence shift observed, through the resolvent, and the macroscale harmonic energy redistribution, through first-order Rayleigh-Schrodinger perturbation theory. We found that the two independent functional domains respond in unison to one structural perturbation of one operator. The identity is exact as operator calculus and its purchase on the brain depends on a single load-bearing seam, the degree heterogeneity of the connectome, which we make explicit. We propose that this single-operator structure is the necessary mathematical scaffolding of our Entangled Loop theory.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physical Review Letters
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
2
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.7%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.7%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.7%
6
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.2%
8
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
10
Neuroscience of Consciousness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Communications Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
14
Entropy
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.4%
18
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
19
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
20
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Physical Review X
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
23
Journal of Mathematical Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
24
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
25
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.0%
26
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
27
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
28
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
29
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
30
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%