Back

Paclitaxel Dosing Regimens Drive Differential CD4⁺ T Cell Responses in the Dorsal Root Ganglia and Modulate Neuropathic Pain Severity

Ferreira, K. G. N.; Weese-Myers, M. E.; Bradford, L. S.; Goode, D. J.

2026-06-09 immunology
10.64898/2026.06.05.730418 bioRxiv
Show abstract

While chemotherapy is effective in killing cancer cells, its non-specific cytotoxicity harms peripheral neurons, leading to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Lacking effective interventions, clinicians often reduce or discontinue treatment. However, these adjustments do not necessarily reverse neuropathy and may jeopardize cancer control. Growing evidence now indicates that chemotherapy not only exerts neurotoxic effects but also modulates immune responses. The degree to which chemotherapy dosing regimens shape CD4+ T cell responses in the dorsal root ganglia (DRG), and how these cells influence mechanical hypersensitivity, remains poorly understood. In this study, female mice were administered a single, high dose (sHD) or multiple low doses (mLD) of paclitaxel (PTX). The mLD group, which received the higher cumulative dose, exhibited an earlier T cell response in the DRG and attenuated mechanical hypersensitivity with fewer ATF3+ DRG neurons compared to the sHD group. This regimen promoted a focused CD4+ T cell response while driving a broad and diversified CD8+ T cell expansion. In contrast, the sHD PTX regimen elicited a delayed, polyfunctional CD4+ T cell response but generated limited CD8+ effector differentiation. To directly assess the contribution of CD4+ T cells to CIPN pathogenesis, we administered PTX to mice lacking CD4+ T cells. CD4 deficient mice were significantly less hypersensitive than CD4+ sufficient mice with a stronger reduction in the sHD group. Although higher cumulative doses are associated with increased CIPN risk, our results suggest that the concentration and frequency of PTX more directly influence DRG immune programming, and that this immune shaping modulates CIPN severity.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 7%
12.1%
2
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.4%
3
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.6%
4
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
5
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
6
Journal of Neuroinflammation
61 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
7
Pain
78 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
8
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.3%
9
The Journal of Pain
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.8%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
12
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.5%
13
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.4%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.4%
15
Science Immunology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
16
Cancer Immunology Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.7%
18
Pharmacological Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
19
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
20
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
23
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
26
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
27
Mucosal Immunology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
28
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
29
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
30
Immunity
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%