Translocation-driven chr19-der(14) interaction is associated with disease-specific transcriptional programs in mantle cell lymphoma
Schwager, A.; Grishina, Y.; Tsimailo, I.; Rashidova, G.; Tiukacheva, E.; Pestriakov, M.; Lagorgette, L.; Bogdanova, D.; Garaev, A.; Michot, J.-M.; Ribrag, V.; Demidov, O.; Andrieu, G.; Ulianov, S.; Razin, S.; Germini, D.; Vassetzky, Y.
Show abstract
Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is defined by the t(11;14)(q13;q32) translocation, which drives constitutive CCND1 expression, yet the broader regulatory consequences of this rearrangement remain incompletely understood. Here, we combined transcriptomic, epigenomic, Hi-C, and 3D-FISH analyses in primary MCL samples and cell lines to investigate the genome-wide impact of t(11;14) on chromatin organization and gene regulation beyond the rearranged chromosomes. We show that MCL cells exhibit widespread enhancer activation, accompanied by expansion of super-enhancer regions. The translocated CCND1 locus repositions toward the nuclear interior and acquires enhancer-like features. Genome-wide analysis highlighted chromosome 19 as a hotspot of transcriptional upregulation. Notably, Hi-C and 3D-FISH revealed recurrent interchromosomal contacts between chromosome 19 and the CCND1 locus, preferentially involving the derivative chromosome. These contacts colocalize with active RNA polymerase II and are associated with increased expression of nearby chr19 genes, suggesting an association between spatial proximity and transcriptional activation in trans. Minnelide treatment reduced chromatin accessibility at the CCND1 locus, decreased the frequency of chr19-der14 interactions, and partially reversed the MCL transcriptional program, while exerting strong anti-tumor effects in vitro and in vivo. Together, these findings identify a recurrent interchromosomal interaction associated with coordinated gene activation in MCL and suggest that spatial genome reorganization contributes to disease-specific transcriptional programs.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- EZH2 mutations in follicular lymphoma distort H3K27me3 profiles and alter transcriptional responses to PRC2 inhibition 96%
- Histone H3.3 lysine 9 and 27 control repressive chromatin states at cryptic cis-regulatory elements and bivalent promoters in mouse embryonic stem cells 95%
- Functional investigation of inherited noncoding genetic variation impacting the pharmacogenomics of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- NAB2-STAT6 drives an EGR1-dependent neuroendocrine program in Solitary Fibrous Tumors 96%
- T-follicular helper cells are epigenetically poised to transdifferentiate into T-regulatory type-1 cells 96%
- Convergent organization of aberrant MYB complex controls oncogenic gene expression in acute myeloid leukemia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeting the MYC interaction network in B-cell lymphoma via histone deacetylase 6 inhibition 95%
- Inhibition of the YAP-MMB interaction and targeting NEK2 as potential therapeutic strategies for YAP-driven cancers 95%
- EWS::FLI1-DHX9 interaction promotes Ewing sarcoma sensitivity to DNA topoisomerase 1 poisons by altering R-loop metabolism 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cancer-specific CTCF binding facilitates oncogenic transcriptional dysregulation 96%
- Allele-specific DNA methylation is increased in cancers and its dense mapping in normal plus neoplastic cells increases the yield of disease-associated regulatory SNPs 95%
- Recruitment of the m6A/Am demethylase FTO to target RNAs by the telomeric zinc finger protein ZBTB48 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Alternative splicing of its 5'-UTR limits CD20 mRNA translation and enables resistance to CD20-directed immunotherapies 96%
- Systems medicine dissection of chromosome 1q amplification reveals oncogenic regulatory circuits and informs targeted therapy in cancer 96%
- KDM6A Regulates Immune Response Genes in Multiple Myeloma 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.