Back

SexPeptID: an automated and reproducible workflow for paleoproteomics sex estimation in archaeological enamel

Morvan, M.

2026-06-09 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.06.05.730301 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate biological sex estimation is a key objective in archaeological and bioanthropological research but remains challenging when skeletal remains are fragmented, juvenile, or poorly preserved. Paleoproteomics approaches based on the detection of sex-specific amelogenin peptides (AMELX/AMELY) have emerged as a powerful alternative to osteological and genetic methods. However, current workflows often lack standardized criteria for peptide-level confidence assessment, potentially affecting the reproducibility and reliability of sex assignments. In this study, I evaluated the impact of peptide-level confidence filtering on paleoproteomics-based sex estimation through the reanalysis of 164 Homo sapiens individuals from 10 published datasets and 26 Bos taurus individuals from 3 datasets, spanning contexts from the Pleistocene to the present. To address methodological inconsistencies, I developed SexPeptID, an R/Shiny-based framework that integrates Posterior Error Probability (PEP) filtering, standardized peptide selection, and explicit uncertainty assessment. Application of SexPeptID revealed that peptide-level filtering substantially affects sex assignment outcomes: 17 previously classified males (10.4%) were reclassified as non-conclusive, while 5 individuals (3.1%) were identified as potentially female. Despite this sensitivity, AMELX/AMELY-based sex estimation remained robust overall, with stable signal ratios observed across archaeological periods. Variability in peptide intensities was primarily associated with dataset-specific factors rather than temporal differences, highlighting the influence of analytical workflows and preservation conditions. By incorporating confidence-based filtering and a non-conclusive classification category, SexPeptID improves the transparency, reproducibility, and reliability of palaeoproteomics sex estimation, providing a standardized framework for future archaeological and bioanthropological studies. HighlightsO_LISexPeptID provides a reproducible framework for amelogenin-based sex estimation. C_LIO_LIPeptide-level confidence filtering significantly affects paleoproteomics sex estimates. C_LIO_LI13.4% of published male assignments were revised after confidence filtering. C_LIO_LIAMELX/AMELY ratios show temporal stability from modern to Pleistocene samples. C_LIO_LIStandardized uncertainty assessment strengthens palaeoproteomics inference. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.8%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.0%
3
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.0%
4
The Analyst
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
5
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
6
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
7
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
10
Biology of Sex Differences
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
13
Evolutionary Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
16
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
17
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.4%
21
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
23
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
24
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
25
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.0%
27
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
28
Forensic Science International: Genetics
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
29
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
30
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%