Back

Biocompatible designated Resin-3D-printed polymers exhibit reproductive toxicity prevented by Parylene-C

Campo, H.; Tran, U.; Zhu, Y.; Lee, H. C.; Duncan, F.

2026-06-10 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.06.05.730268 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Resin three-dimensional (3D) printing is an increasingly popular manufacturing and prototyping method used to create microphysiological systems (MPS), but resin cytotoxicity significantly hinders its adoption, especially when sensitive cell models are incorporated. The mammalian oocyte and early preimplantation embryo consist of cells that are highly sensitive to toxicants and thus represent stringent cell-based models for biocompatibility testing. We developed a Multi-Endpoint Oocyte Safety Assay (MEIOSA) to evaluate the biocompatibility of four ISO 10993 biocompatible BioMed resins (Clear, Durable, Elastic 50A, and Flex 80A). MEIOSA assesses the viability, morphology, meiotic stage, and meiotic spindle morphology of the oocyte after in vitro maturation (IVM). Oocytes were in vitro matured in plate inserts 3D printed with the four BioMed resins. Oocytes cultured in rigid resins (Clear and Durable) or elastomeric resins (Elastic 50A, and Flex 80A) exhibited impaired meiotic progression and complete oocyte degeneration, respectively, relative to controls cultured in polystyrene which matured normally. To determine whether such cytotoxicity could be prevented, we coated the resin inserts with a 5 {micro}m impermeable Parylene-C (PC) barrier. PC coating completely rescued the degeneration and meiotic maturation defect phenotypes for all resins. Remarkably, when the most cytotoxic material (Flex 80A) was coated with PC, the resulting eggs were fertilization-competent and produced embryos capable of normal preimplantation development via in vitro fertilization. Our findings demonstrate that standardized viability-based biocompatibility tests do not identify cytotoxic effects for all cell types and establish MEIOSA as a high sensitivity test model to robustly evaluate biomaterial biocompatibility. Furthermore, PC coating prevents the toxic effects of all resin-3D-printed materials tested, opening up a new toolbox to create MPS compatible with reproductive, and by extension, other sensitive cell cultures. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=197 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/730268v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (71K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18fab44org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1352e5forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@77889forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1aabd89_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biofabrication
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Advanced Functional Materials
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
3
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.9%
4
Advanced Materials Technologies
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
6
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
8
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
9
Bioactive Materials
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
10
Biomaterials Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
SLAS Technology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Biomaterials Science
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.9%
15
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
16
ACS Applied Bio Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.4%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.3%
19
Materials Today Bio
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
20
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
21
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Advanced Materials
56 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.6%
27
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%