Multimodal physical evidence uncovers interpretable gene regulatory networks for perturbation prediction
Yang, Z.; Huang, S.; Bai, G.; Dong, J.; Wang, J.; Li, S. Z.
Show abstract
Gene regulatory networks govern cell fate transitions through dynamic causal mechanisms1. Since exhaustively mapping this vast perturbation space experimentally is prohibitive2, scalable computational models are essential. Yet, current frameworks fall short because they infer statistical co-expression rather than physical mechanisms, remain blind to non-canonical regulators lacking classical DNA-binding motifs, and fail to generalize across unseen perturbation factors or cell lines. Here we show that a multimodal biophysical framework, VitaGRN, overcomes these barriers by constructing a biophysical regulatory scaffold from multimodal evidence and propagating interactions to capture non-canonical regulators. By leveraging structurally aligned protein embeddings, VitaGRN predicts zero-shot perturbation responses and uncovers non-canonical translational control programs. Notably, VitaGRN demonstrates robust generalization across unseen factors, cell lines, and developmental transitions. Ultimately, VitaGRN generates a confidence-calibrated virtual perturbation atlas spanning over a thousand factors. This resource reframes gene regulatory networks from static correlation graphs into dynamically generalizable and mechanistically trans-parent models, streamlining wet-lab candidate prioritization.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Iterative deep learning-design of human enhancers exploits condensed sequence grammar to achieve cell type-specificity 97%
- Integrative, high-resolution analysis of single cell gene expression across experimental conditions with PARAFAC2-RISE 96%
- Multiome Perturb-seq unlocks scalable discovery of integrated perturbation effects on the transcriptome and epigenome 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.