EMOD with Full Parasite Genetics: A modeling framework for evaluating parasite genetic metrics for operational malaria molecular surveillance

Malaria molecular surveillance (MMS) is becoming increasingly common in endemic settings and has been proposed as a tool for monitoring parasite transmission to inform programmatic decision-making. However, the conditions under which parasite genetic metrics provide interpretable signals for broader use cases, such as assessing intervention impacts and detecting importation, remain under-characterized. We present EMOD with Full Parasite Genetics (FPG), a simulation framework designed to explore how parasite genetic metrics arise from transmission, intervention, importation, and sampling processes at programmatically relevant timescales. Using seasonal scenarios across a range of transmission intensities, we demonstrate three principal findings. First, genetic metrics can detect insecticide-treated net intervention impacts at seasonal and yearly timescales, but the strength, timing, and form of the relationship between genetic and epidemiological measures vary by metric and sampling timing. Second, importation can break the expected relationship between parasite genetic diversity from local transmission intensity at very low incidence, allowing low-transmission settings with substantial importation to maintain elevated diversity metrics. Third, convenience sampling practices, including sample size, collection timing, and the clinical composition of sampled populations, introduce non-random biases in genetic metric estimation in a way that obscures the true transmission signal. Together, these findings show that parasite genetic metrics can support operational surveillance, but that their interpretation depends on transmission context, importation, metric choice, and sampling design. EMOD FPG provides a framework for evaluating these dependencies in future setting-specific analyses and for guiding the interpretation of parasite genetic data across sites and over time.