Back

Stochastic Morphodynamics of the Human Aorta Across the Lifespan

Twohig, K. C.; Mansour, M.; Pugar, J. A.; Yuan, K.; Pocivavsek, L.; Klishin, A. A.

2026-06-08 surgery
10.64898/2026.06.05.26355015 medRxiv
Show abstract

Biological systems evolve as continuous dynamical processes, but at organ-scale and across human lifespans they are rarely observed longitudinally--population data typically exist instead as sparse, cross-sectional snapshots. Inferring lifespan dynamics from such data requires methods distinct from those used at cellular and tissue scales where dense observations are accessible. We address this problem in the thoracic aorta, where surgical decisions currently rest on static, age- and sex-agnostic diameter thresholds that reduce three-dimensional morphology to a single scalar. Treating normal aortic morphology as a stochastic dynamical system, we pose a continuous-time drift-diffusion process in a two-coordinate state space of normalized surface area (A) and normalized fluctuation in integrated Gaussian curvature ({delta} K), and fit closed-form solutions of the Fokker-Planck equation by maximum likelihood to a sex-balanced, age-uniform cohort spanning infancy to age 99. Inter-individual variability is treated as a fitted diffusion parameter rather than as residual scatter, which is distinct from prior normative studies that report variability as scatter around a regression line. The framework identifies two growth regimes for aortic size (childhood expansion followed by persistent adult growth, with adult males growing approximately 70% faster than adult females) and a single dynamical regime for aortic shape, with heteroscedastic variability accumulating at a rate comparable to the mean drift over the lifespan. Applied to independent cohorts of acute and chronic thoracic aortic dissections, the multivariate model identifies over 95% as statistical outliers via Mahalanobis distance, consistently outperforming either coordinate alone. The same probabilistic envelope that describes normal aging thus defines a baseline against which disease can be detected, supporting a shift toward dynamic, age- and sex-aware assessment of thoracic aortic pathology.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 1%
17.5%
2
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 14%
4.9%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
4.0%
5
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
7
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
10
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.1%
11
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.1%
12
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
14
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
18
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.3%
23
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
25
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
27
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%