Back

Multivariate Machine Learning Analysis of M-ECG-derived Heart Rate Variability in TBI Veterans, With and Without Comorbid PTSD

Izadysadr, A.; Bagherzadeh, H. S.; Rowland, J.; Martindale, S. L.; Stapleton-Kotloski, J. R.; Godwin, D.

2026-06-08 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.06.05.26354915 medRxiv
Show abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) frequently co-occur in Veterans, producing overlapping symptoms and shared autonomic dysregulation. Heart rate variability (HRV) offers a noninvasive measure of autonomic function. Univariate HRV analyses often fail to capture complex, multivariate patterns associated with comorbidity. This study applied machine learning to HRV features extracted from MEG-derived electrocardiogram (M-ECG) signals to differentiate Veterans with TBI alone (TBI-alone; n = 42) from those with comorbid PTSD (TBI+PTSD; n = 40). Time-domain, frequency-domain, geometric, and nonlinear HRV metrics were analyzed using nested cross-validated Random Forest and XGBoost classifiers, with Boruta-based feature selection and SHapley Additive exPlanations for model interpretability. Both classifiers achieved above-chance discrimination (Random Forest AUC = 0.663; XGBoost AUC = 0.635). Multivariate models identified distributed autonomic signatures in TBI+PTSD, including altered sympathovagal balance, increased low-frequency proportion, and greater heart rate complexity. In contrast, univariate HRV differences were subtle and did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. These findings demonstrate how using multivariate machine learning HRV analysis could help with detecting comorbidity-specific autonomic patterns, suggesting that HRV-derived signatures may serve as exploratory biomarkers for risk assessment and targeted interventions in Veterans with TBI and PTSD.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.