Back

Prediction of immunotherapy response using live tumor fragments from routine clinical biopsies

Braun, D.; Dana, N.; Hernan, H. R.; Sahni, S.; Scribano, C.; Johnson, C.; Vedder, L.; von Euw, E.; Zweng, J.; Wargowski, E.; Sunil, A.; Sharma, D.; Routh, J.; Rexroad, K.; McDonnell, P.; Jergens, V.; Costa, C.; Zuniga, R.; Toia, G. V.; Patel, P. M.; Martin, R. C. G.; Majeed, U.; Mukhopadhyay, D.; Lou, Y.; Kokabi, N.; Jakub, J. W.; Hays, D.; Godwin, A. K.; Giffi, V.; Gelbard, A.; Friedl, A.; Duimstra, E. K.; Dronca, R. S.; Chen, R.; Chalfin, H.; Broome, B.; Babiker, H. M.; Chandra, T.; Caenepeel, S.; Hrycyniak, L. C. F.; Sood, C.; Ramos, H.; Patel, P.; Advani, P.; Gierman, H. J.; Taube, J.

2026-06-10 oncology
10.64898/2026.06.05.26354635 medRxiv
Show abstract

Functional ex vivo assays using live tumor tissues have demonstrated strong predictive accuracy for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) but are not scalable, requiring manual processing of large resections collected at academic centers. Here, an ex vivo live tumor fragment (LTF) platform was developed using standard-of-care biopsies from 228 patients with suspected malignancy collected across prospective, multicenter observational trials and biobanks. Hierarchical clustering of ICI-mediated changes in cytokine production identified two groups: responders and nonresponders. A binary classifier (elive index) using 8 cytokines achieved an AUC of 0.99 for cluster prediction. elive index correctly predicted clinical benefit in 93% (26/28) of patients (P = 3.2x10-5) and accurately identified 83% (10/12) of objective responders. Critically, elive responders were identified among biomarker-negative patients, highlighting the platform as a scalable approach that complements existing companion diagnostics and expands the population of patients identified to benefit from ICI therapy.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 10%
14.6%
2
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
4
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
5
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
7
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
9
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
11
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
12
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
13
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
16
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.9%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.9%
22
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%
25
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%