Back

Development and Prospective Validation of Predictive Model for Early Hemodynamic Deterioration in Critical Care: A Multicenter Study

Nagori, A.; Singh, P.; Firdos, S.; Devadiga, A.; Vats, V.; Gupta, A.; Bandhey, H.; Ailavadi, P.; Awasthi, R.; Narotam, N.; Mishra, A.; Lodha, R.; Sethi, T.

2026-06-10 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.64898/2026.06.05.26353765 medRxiv
Show abstract

High-frequency physiological monitoring in ICUs can identify impending deterioration hours before clinical recognition yet extracting reliable early-warning signals from noisy vital-sign streams remains challenging. We present SIgnose, an interpretable prediction framework for early detection of abnormal shock index (SI), built from routinely monitored vital signs using physiologic variability and nonlinear time-series features. SIgnose was developed on the eICU Collaborative Research Database and externally validated on the MIMIC-III adult database and a pediatric SafeICU cohort (AIIMS New Delhi), with additional prospective validation in the pediatric ICU. We benchmarked three representation strategies: (i) engineered physiologic variability and nonlinear time-series features, (ii) deep learning, and (iii) Llama-3.1-8B embeddings with low-rank adaptation. Physiologic variability features consistently demonstrated superior cross-cohort generalization. The final model used 3,970 features from five vital signs to predict abnormal SI up to 8 hours ahead, achieving AUROC 0.861 (95% CI 0.859-0.863) and AUPRC 0.927 (95% CI 0.925-0.929) on eICU. External validation yielded AUROC 0.870 (95% CI 0.863-0.876) and AUPRC 0.935 (95% CI 0.930-0.940) on MIMIC-III, and AUROC 0.875 (95% CI 0.863-0.888) and AUPRC 0.915 (95% CI 0.898-0.930) on SafeICU; prospective pediatric validation (n = 88) achieved AUROC 0.885 (95% CI 0.868-0.902) and AUPRC 0.911 (95% CI 0.882-0.936). SHAP interpretability analysis identified heart rate variability, respiratory trend dynamics, and multi-scale blood pressure variability as key early-warning signatures. These findings establish SIgnose as a reproducible, low-compute, early-warning framework and demonstrate that physiologic variability features provide robust, generalizable representations for early deterioration detection across adult and pediatric critical care.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
18.4%
2
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
3
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
4
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.2%
6
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.9%
8
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.8%
10
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.1%
13
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
14
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
16
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
18
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
20
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
21
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
22
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%