Back

Quantitative stable isotope probing to measure in situ growth of protist populations

Mau, R. L.; Hayer, M.; Dijkstra, P.; Geisen, S.; Hungate, B. A.; Schwartz, E.

2026-06-05 microbiology
10.64898/2026.06.04.730198 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Soil protists shape microbial food webs and nutrient cycling, yet methods for measuring their population growth in soil have lagged behind the taxonomic resolution available from 18S rRNA gene sequencing. Microscopy-based approaches can estimate abundance and growth, but with limited taxonomic resolution. Here, we tested whether quantitative stable isotope probing (qSIP) can provide reproducible, sequencing-resolved growth measurements for soil protists. We incubated soil with natural-abundance or {superscript 1} O-labeled water and measured taxon-specific 18O enrichment in DNA using three common 18S rRNA gene primer sets. 18O enrichment values were positively correlated across datasets, with relationships closest to 1:1 after poorly resolved taxonomic assignments were excluded, indicating that qSIP provides reproducible population-level growth signals across marker choices. We then compared 18S amplicon profiles from unfractionated DNA with qSIP-derived growth measurements across a soil moisture gradient. Amplicon profiles showed small shifts in relative abundances of major protist groups, whereas qSIP revealed a large moisture response in the growing community: 7 ASVs were growing at 20% field capacity compared with 143 at 80% field capacity, representing 1.6% and 63.3% of total protist relative abundance, respectively. Average growth was <1% day{square}1 in the two driest treatments, increasing to 2.1% day{square}1 at 60% and 5.6% day{square}1 at 80% field capacity; among growing taxa, rates averaged 8.7% and 8.3% day{square}1 in the two wetter treatments. By pairing taxonomic resolution with isotope-based growth estimates, qSIP with 18O-H2O moves soil protist ecology toward quantitative population dynamics: identifying which taxa grow, how fast, and how growth responds to the environment.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
2
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.6%
3
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.7%
4
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
5
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
5.0%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.7%
7
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
9
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.9%
10
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.2%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
12
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
13
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
14
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
15
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
16
FEMS Microbes
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
17
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
18
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.1%
20
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.1%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
22
Microbiology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Applied Soil Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
25
Environmental Microbiology Reports
31 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
26
MicrobiologyOpen
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%