Back

Establishment of microbial strains from the river, groundwater, and soil in the hyporheic zone is limited despite connectivity

Mullen, S.; West-Roberts, J.; Chen, L.-X.; Newcomer, M. E.; Hoff, J.; Brodie, E. L.; Williams, K. H.; Lei, S.; Banfield, J. F.

2026-06-04 microbiology
10.64898/2026.06.04.730025 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Microbial diversity across ecosystems may be impacted by dispersal pathways and selection due to physiochemical conditions, and so it is hard to predict the extent of strain sharing across heterogeneous environmental compartments. Evaluation of patterns of strain-level overlap requires genome-level comparisons using extensive datasets collected over large spatial scales. Here, we sampled microbiomes beneath (hyporheic zone) and within the East River (Colorado, USA) and found little or no strain overlap at sites along the river corridor, despite connection by river flow, suggesting selection due to the local environment. Comparisons involving microbiomes from hillslopes and riparian zone soil yielded essentially no strain-level overlap with the microbiomes of river and hyporheic zones. We also sampled a nearby groundwater well and found near-perfect genotypic overlap with strains in one hyporheic zone location that exhibited active groundwater upwelling. Given an absence of direct connectivity between these two locations via discrete hydrologic flow paths, we conclude that groundwater strains are widely dispersed in the aquifer. As hyporheic zone microbiomes in zones with low river flow share no strains with groundwater microbiomes, we infer that strains introduced by groundwater mixing in the hyporheic zone are transitory. We conclude that despite evidence for mixing of river-and-hyporheic zone water, and river-and-groundwater on short time scales, establishment of transported strains in the hyporheic zone is minimal.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.9%
2
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.7%
3
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.8%
4
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
5
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.7%
6
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.0%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 15%
3.5%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.4%
10
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
Environmental Microbiology Reports
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
14
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
15
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
17
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
18
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
19
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
20
FEMS Microbes
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
22
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Microbial Ecology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
Environmental Microbiome
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
29
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
30
Limnology and Oceanography
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%