Back

Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential Refines Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome Stages 0-3

Lu, J.; Sun, S.; Deng, Z.; Wang, S.; Wei, C.; Jiang, S.; Li, W.

2026-06-08 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.06.04.26354963 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Chronic low-grade inflammation drives cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), an age-related driver of systemic inflammation, is linked to several cardiometabolic disorders. However, whether CHIP modifies CKM progression and contributes to heterogeneity in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk within the CKM framework remains uninvestigated. Methods: This cohort study included 307,025 UK Biobank participants at CKM stages 0-3 free of baseline CVD. CHIP status was identified via whole-exome sequencing (WES). The association between CHIP and baseline CKM severity was examined, along with the independent and joint effects of CHIP and CKM stages on incident CVD risk. The joint effects of CHIP and polygenic risk scores (PRS) were further assessed, and the incremental predictive value of incorporating CHIP into the AHA PREVENT equations was evaluated. Results: CHIP carriers were more likely to present with advanced CKM stages [OR 1.14 (1.09-1.20), P < 0.001] and exhibited higher incident CVD risk during follow-up [HR 1.13 (1.08-1.18), P < 0.001]. Significant joint effects between CHIP and CKM stages were observed, with the highest risk among CHIP carriers at CKM stage 3 [HR 1.63 (1.50-1.78), P < 0.001]. Large or multiple CHIP mutations conferred greater hazards, with distinct gene-specific effects observed. Moreover, CHIP and high genetic risk also jointly amplified CVD susceptibility. Most importantly, incorporating CHIP into AHA PREVENT significantly improved risk discrimination. Conclusions: CHIP is a significant risk factor associated with more advanced CKM stages and amplifies incident CVD risk. Integrating CHIP into existing prevention strategies may refine CVD risk stratification.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.7%
2
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.9%
4
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
6
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
7
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
9
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
14
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
15
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
16
Metabolism
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.3%
18
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
20
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
25
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
26
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
27
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
30
Kidney International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%