Back

Correlates of DHS-defined infecund/menopausal status among Nigerian women aged 45-49: Evidence from the 2024 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey

Ogunsemoyin, O.; Ayinmoro, A. D.

2026-06-08 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.06.04.26354907 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: Women aged 45-49 occupy a heterogeneous late-reproductive-life stage, but population research often treats them as a uniform group. This study examined correlates of Demographic and Health Survey (DHS)-defined infecund/menopausal status among Nigerian women aged 45-49. Methods: This cross-sectional secondary analysis used the 2024 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey Women Recode dataset. Weighted descriptive statistics summarised reproductive exposure status among 3,237 women. Out of these, 3,110 women classified as either fecund or infecund/menopausal were subjected to Survey-adjusted Chi-square tests and Binary Logistic regression at p<0.05, where pregnant and postpartum amenorrhoeic women were excluded. Results: More than half of women were classified as infecund/menopausal (54.1%), while 41.5% were fecund; 3.2% were postpartum amenorrhoeic, and 1.3% were pregnant. Findings indicated that currently married/cohabiting women (AOR=4.87; 95% CI: 2.24-10.56) and formerly married women (AOR=8.30; 95% CI: 3.69-18.66) had higher odds of infecund/menopausal classification than women never in a union. Secondary education, higher education, middle-to-richest wealth quintiles, and five or more children ever born were associated with lower odds, while Northern minority ethnicity was associated with higher odds. Adding the current contraceptive method attenuated several education, wealth and parity associations; modern-method and traditional-method users had markedly lower odds than non-users. Conclusion: Late-reproductive-life exposure status among Nigerian women aged 45-49 is socially patterned, with union status showing the most stable association. DHS-defined infecund/menopausal status is a demographic exposure category rather than clinically confirmed menopause. It is therefore concluded that the cross-sectional associations should not be interpreted causally.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.