Back

Correlates of DHS-defined infecund/menopausal status among Nigerian women aged 45-49: Evidence from the 2024 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey

Ogunsemoyin, O.; Ayinmoro, A. D.

2026-06-08 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.06.04.26354907 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: Women aged 45-49 occupy a heterogeneous late-reproductive-life stage, but population research often treats them as a uniform group. This study examined correlates of Demographic and Health Survey (DHS)-defined infecund/menopausal status among Nigerian women aged 45-49. Methods: This cross-sectional secondary analysis used the 2024 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey Women Recode dataset. Weighted descriptive statistics summarised reproductive exposure status among 3,237 women. Out of these, 3,110 women classified as either fecund or infecund/menopausal were subjected to Survey-adjusted Chi-square tests and Binary Logistic regression at p<0.05, where pregnant and postpartum amenorrhoeic women were excluded. Results: More than half of women were classified as infecund/menopausal (54.1%), while 41.5% were fecund; 3.2% were postpartum amenorrhoeic, and 1.3% were pregnant. Findings indicated that currently married/cohabiting women (AOR=4.87; 95% CI: 2.24-10.56) and formerly married women (AOR=8.30; 95% CI: 3.69-18.66) had higher odds of infecund/menopausal classification than women never in a union. Secondary education, higher education, middle-to-richest wealth quintiles, and five or more children ever born were associated with lower odds, while Northern minority ethnicity was associated with higher odds. Adding the current contraceptive method attenuated several education, wealth and parity associations; modern-method and traditional-method users had markedly lower odds than non-users. Conclusion: Late-reproductive-life exposure status among Nigerian women aged 45-49 is socially patterned, with union status showing the most stable association. DHS-defined infecund/menopausal status is a demographic exposure category rather than clinically confirmed menopause. It is therefore concluded that the cross-sectional associations should not be interpreted causally.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 1%
39.5%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
19.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.5%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.8%
5
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
9
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
11
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
12
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
13
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
14
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
17
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
19
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
21
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
22
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%