Assessment of safe wheeled walker use in frail older adults: Development of a video-based rating instrument
Leonhardt, R.; Lindemann, U.; Schneider, M.; Rapp, K.; Klenk, J.
Show abstract
Background: Wheeled walkers can improve safety during walking, but improper use may increase fall risk among frail older adults. No suitable tool exists to assess safe indoor wheeled walker use in this population. This study aimed to develop and validate a video-based expert assessment tool. Methods: Based on the literature and expert consensus, seven problematic indoor situations were identified, and an assessment tool with five safety criteria per situation was developed (maximum score = 35). Fifty participants (mean age 83.9 years, 64% women) from a geriatric rehabilitation clinic and a nursing home were video-recorded while using a rollator. Expert ratings were compared with nursing staff ratings, self-ratings, and the Timed Up and Go test to evaluate validity. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were determined from independent ratings by two physiotherapists and a repeated expert rating after seven days. Sensitivity to change was assessed after two weeks of rehabilitation, and feasibility by the time required for assessment. Results: The expert score of rater 1 at baseline was 28.5 points, and assessment required a mean of 17.5 minutes. Intra-rater reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.98) and inter-rater reliability was good (ICC = 0.80). Validity analyses showed the strongest association with nursing staff assessments (r = 0.74) and a moderate association with the Timed Up and Go test (r = -0.45). After two weeks, patients improved by an average of 2.38 points (8.4% of baseline score). Conclusions: The new instrument demonstrated high reliability, acceptable validity, sensitivity to change, and good feasibility for assessing safe wheeled walker use in frail older adults. Trial registration number and date of registration: DRKS00038358, 07/11/2025
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Validity of the German version of the Stay Independent Questionnaire applied by telephone interview: A diagnostic accuracy study 97%
- Supervised and self-directed technology-based dual-task exercise training programme for older adults at risk of falling – Protocol for a feasibility study 96%
- Uneven terrain treadmill walking in younger and older adults 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Real-World Mobility Recovery after Hip Fracture using Digital Mobility Outcomes 95%
- Factors associated with access to virtual care in older adults: A cross-sectional study 94%
- Frailty is a predictor of medication-related harm requiring healthcare utilisation: a multicentre prospective cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of Physical Activity Over Time in Older Patients Rehabilitating after Hip Fracture Surgery: A Preliminary Study 97%
- Deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) process evaluation 94%
- “If somebody had told me I’d feel like I do now, I wouldn’t have believed them…” Older adults’ experiences of the BELL trial: a qualitative study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older adults: An umbrella review 94%
- Effect of a simple exercise programme on hospitalisation-associated disability in older patients: a randomised controlled trial. 94%
- Frailty and mortality in hospitalized older adults with COVID-19: retrospective observational study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of the German version of the Life-Space Assessment LSA-D 96%
- Cohort Profile: Baseline characteristics and design of the McMaster Monitoring My Mobility (MacM3) Study, a prospective digital mobility cohort of community-dwelling older Canadians from Southern Ontario 94%
- Association between older patients receiving geriatric co-management at the emergency department and acute hospital admissions compared to usual care: an observational, controlled study. 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.