Back

An integrated proteogenomic investigation of the human liver uncovers molecular drivers of steatotic liver disease

Gobeil, E.; Bourgault, J.; Enault, M.; Cote, V.; Mitchell, P. L.; Ruel, L.-J.; Girard, A. S.; Vohl, M.-C.; Arsenault, B. J.

2026-06-06 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.06.04.26354903 medRxiv
Show abstract

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is rapidly increasing worldwide, yet effective targeted therapies remain limited. To better understand the molecular mechanisms underlying MASLD, we performed an integrated proteogenomic analysis of human liver tissue. Using mass spectrometry, we quantified 2,744 proteins in 504 liver biopsies from the Quebec Obesity Biobank and examined changes across disease stages. To investigate causality, we integrated liver proteomics with RNA sequencing and genome-wide genotyping to map thousands of protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs) and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs). These molecular data were combined with summary statistics from a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies including 16,532 MASLD cases and 1,240,188 controls. Mendelian randomization and genetic colocalization analyses revealed that most proteins differentially expressed across MASLD stages were not causally implicated in disease risk, whereas several genetically predicted liver proteins showed evidence of causal effects. Among these, higher hepatic levels of the MTARC1 protein were causally associated with MASLD and hepatic fat accumulation. Phenome-wide analyses suggested that MTARC1 inhibition may reduce the risk of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and cholelithiasis while improving lipid profiles. Notably, the causal MTARC1 variant influenced liver protein levels but not gene expression. Genetic analyses also identified ERLIN1 and HSD17B13 as potential therapeutic targets. In contrast, eQTLs and pQTLs at other loci such as GCKR showed opposite effects on MASLD risk. These findings highlight the importance of integrating tissue proteomics with human genetics to distinguish biomarkers from causal drivers and to identify promising therapeutic targets for MASLD.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.0%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.3%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.1%
4
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
5
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
7
Nature Metabolism
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
8
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.0%
11
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.0%
12
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Journal of Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
18
Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
19
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
22
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
25
Diabetes
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%