Concurrent tDCS-fMRI: Impact of the current-induced magnetic fields on the measured BOLD signal
Cunha, T.; Grundei, M.; Gregersen, F.; Nierhaus, T.; Hanson, L. G.; Blankenburg, F.; Thielscher, A.
Show abstract
Background: Understanding how transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) affects brain activity critically benefits from the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure the related BOLD (blood-oxygenation-level-dependent) signal changes. However, the small magnetic fields induced by the stimulation currents can cause artifacts in the fMRI images that can compromise findings from concurrent tDCS-fMRI studies. Objective: To identify how the current-induced magnetic fields affect fMRI data and establish a quantitative framework for evaluating their impact on concurrent tDCS-fMRI measurements. Methods: Magnetic fields induced by currents inside the head and electrode cables were calculated for a standard motor cortex montage. Their effects on echo-planar images (EPI) were simulated based on a framework derived from MR physics first principles and validated using phantom experiments. The framework was applied to artificially induce artifacts related to the tDCS current flow in current-free fMRI time series from 5 participants. These were compared to active runs from the same participants where tDCS intensity was varied in a block design. Results: Currents in the electrode cables were the main contributors to the current flow-related artifacts in the EPI images, which occurred both locally by causing geometric distortions and remotely by affecting the dynamic update of the scanner demodulation frequency. The artificially induced fMRI activations corresponded well to those measured during real tDCS on the single-subject level for intensities of 2 mA and higher. Conclusion: The current-induced magnetic fields can cause intensity changes comparable to typical BOLD responses. Their impact on the statistical results depends on the chosen experimental design (electrode locations, cable paths, imaging parameters, fMRI paradigm). The simulation framework provides a principled approach to evaluate the impact of these artifacts during the design and data analyses of concurrent tDCS-fMRI studies.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accelerated multi-shell diffusion MRI with Gaussian process estimated reconstruction of multi-band imaging 96%
- QSMxT: Robust Masking and Artefact Reduction for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping 96%
- Attenuation of Motion Artifacts in fMRI using Discrete Reconstruction of Irregular fMRI Trajectories (DRIFT) 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- An in-vivo study of BOLD laminar responses as a function of echo time and static magnetic field strength 96%
- Temporal signal-to-noise changes in combined multiband- and slice-accelerated echo-planar imaging with a 20- and 64-channel coil 95%
- Non-Invasive Perfusion MR Imaging of the Human Brain via Breath-Holding 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.