Back

The Metaphase Chromatin Unit: A Novel Unit of Higher-Order Chromosome Organization in Human Mitotic Cells

Goyal, M.; Goyal, R.

2026-06-08 genomics
10.64898/2026.06.03.729997 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background and ObjectivesThe linear relation between human metaphase chromosome length and DNA content has never been rigorously reconciled with modern Hi-C models of mitotic chromatin folding. We tested whether the relation implies a quantitative unit of mitotic chromosome organization. MethodsWe pooled metaphase lengths for 24 human chromosomes from five cytogenetic studies of cultured peripheral lymphocytes and regressed length against base-pair content from GRCh38 and T2T-CHM13 v2.0. Pre-specified analyses comprised ordinary least-squares and power-law fits, arm-level decomposition, and reconciliation with the Gibcus 2018 helical loop-array model. Orthogonal validation used Rao 2014 Hi-C boundary counts and Pope 2014 Repli-Seq. ResultsLength scales linearly with DNA content as L (m) = 0.0329 x Mb + 0.043 (R-squared = 0.998, power-law exponent 0.98 +/-0.01), with a cross-karyotype compaction density of 33.4 +/-1.0 nm/Mb. T2T-CHM13 reanalysis identifies satellite over-condensation; the arm-level residual correlates with p-arm fraction (r = 0.65, p = 5.6e-4). We propose an operational Metaphase Chromatin Unit (MCU) as a quantitative scaling unit (not a discrete structural quantum, as quantization tests are negative): 1 MCU = 7.6 Mb DNA = 0.25 m axial length, numerically corresponding to one Gibcus late-metaphase helical turn; the human haploid genome scales to 406 MCUs. The pairwise megabase-shift slope of 32.75 nm/Mb (R-squared = 0.996) and the approximately 6 Mb Abbe optical detection threshold correctly classify 9 of 9 microdeletion syndromes as karyotype-visible versus FISH-required. ConclusionsThe MCU provides a unified quantitative unit for human mitotic chromosome organization, integrating cytogenetic, Hi-C, polymer-biophysical, and clinical scales.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.8%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.2%
3
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
5
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.4%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
7
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.0%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 13%
4.0%
9
Epigenetics & Chromatin
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
10
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
11
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
12
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
13
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
15
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
16
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
19
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.3%
20
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
23
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
26
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
27
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
28
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
29
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
30
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%