Back

Distinct associations between multimodal brain measures and psychopathology domains predict adolescent functioning

Ramduny, J.; Mulvey, A. G.; Kohler, R.; Riley, S.; Yip, S. W.; Baskin-Sommers, A.

2026-06-04 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.03.729937 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Adolescent psychopathology is partly rooted in measurable disruptions across key neural networks, yet the field still lacks an integrated, multimodal understanding of these brain-behavior links. Here, we examined how structural, microstructural, and functional measures across corticostriatal, corticolimbic, and executive control networks relate to psychopathology domains and explored how these associations predicted future psychosocial functioning. We used data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive DevelopmentSM Study (n=5,408) and ran a regularized canonical correlation analysis to identify distinct modes of covariation between multiple brain measures and psychopathology domains when youth were 13-14 years old. The resulting canonical brain and psychopathology scores were used to predict school-related impairment one year later. First, higher diffusivity and decreased activation during a reward task across all three networks as well as lower corticostriatal surface area were related to higher broad psychopathology. Second, lower corticolimbic diffusivity, executive control volume and surface area, and cortical thickness across all three networks as well as higher corticostriatal and corticolimbic volumes were related to higher anxiety but lower externalizing. For the first mode, higher psychopathology scores predicted more school-related impairment one year later. For the second mode, higher brain and higher psychopathology scores predicted less school-related impairment one year later. Identifying how specific neural measures align with psychopathology domains, as well as how both forecast reallilworld functioning, advances the conceptualization of adolescent mental health. This approach clarifies which levels of analysis provide distinct versus shared information about youth functioning and highlights potential mechanisms that may inform future targets for change.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.0%
2
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.9%
4
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
5
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
7
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.8%
8
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
9
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
10
Nature Mental Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
12
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
14
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.6%
16
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.6%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
18
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
19
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
20
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.6%
24
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%