Back

Gene expression is stable despite widespread cis and trans regulatory divergence in Saccharomyces yeasts

Rojas, D. S.; Lang, G. I.

2026-06-05 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.06.03.729905 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Regulatory evolution can alter phenotypes, but cis- and trans-regulatory mechanisms may also diverge extensively while total transcript abundance remains stable. Comparisons of parental expression with allele-specific expression in F1 hybrids provide a framework for separating cis- and trans-regulatory effects because both parental alleles are measured in a shared trans-regulatory environment. Here, we analyzed RNA sequencing data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces paradoxus, and their F1 hybrid. Regulatory divergence was widespread, with 61.3% of tested orthologs showing significant divergence in at least one cis or trans component. However, hybrid expression remained largely conserved, with 81.6% of genes not significantly different from either parent. Compensatory cis-trans divergence predominated over reinforcing divergence, consistent with widespread buffering of transcript abundance. To connect genome-wide patterns to mechanism, we analyzed the strongly cis-diverged locus LYS2 and found species differences in promoter architecture, including an S. cerevisiae-specific AT-rich insertion, altered spacing among candidate regulatory features, and a promoter-proximal TATA-like element unique to S. cerevisiae. Sequence-based nucleosome prediction suggests that these differences create a broader promoter-proximal nucleosome-depleted region in S. cerevisiae than in S. paradoxus. We also quantified allele-resolved intron retention and found that splicing was broadly conserved, with only rare locus-specific hybrid-associated shifts. Together, these results show that regulatory divergence is widespread but often buffered in the hybrid, whereas post-transcriptional divergence is comparatively limited.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.