Back

dCas allele sequestration (das-CRISPR): A Versatile New Method to Achieve Monoallelic Gene Editing in Mouse Embryos and in cell culture.

Yehia, G.; Pan, J.; Servinsky, L.; Hong, X.; Romanienko, P.

2026-06-04 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.06.03.729891 bioRxiv
Show abstract

CRISPR-Cas9 technology is a powerful tool extensively used for genome editing in mouse and many other species. Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 efficiently cuts both alleles in mouse zygotes leaving many edited embryos without a functional protein that might be needed to sustain development, to survive postnatally or to reproduce, thus complicating its overwhelmingly advantageous use in making gene modifications. About 25% of mouse genes are essential for embryonic development and another 7% are necessary for fertility, thus for these genes it is desirable to maintain a functional allele to establish viable lines from CRISPR-Cas9 edited mouse embryos. However, exclusive monoallelic editing is challenging to achieve with current CRISPR methods. Controlling the activity of Cas9 in genome editing is an ongoing research field focused on developing new methods to curtail its damage caused by excess of on-target and off-target editing. In this study we describe a novel and a simple method, we termed das-CRISPR, for dCas allele sequestration in combination with CRISPR system, that allows monoallelic editing of targeted allele in mouse and in cultured cell lines. This method incorporates the use of a nuclease deficient deadCas9 (dCas9) present at higher levels than an active Cas9, both complexed with the same single guide RNA (sgRNA) sequence. We showed the delivery of the two proteins as ribonucleoprotein complexes (RNP) into mouse zygotes leads to the generation of viable and fertile mice carrying lethal mutations in an essential gene. We found that greater amounts of dCas9 RNPs bind and protect a target site while the lower amount of functional Cas9 RNPs accessed the unoccupied target site resulting in higher frequency of monoallelic gene editing, compared to using just Cas9 alone. We also showed this method can mitigate and control the activity of Cas9 in mouse NIH3T3 cells in culture to achieve monoallelic editing. This method is a versatile approach to controlling excessive Cas9 activity on-target and off-target both in vitro and in vivo.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
23.4%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.3%
3
The CRISPR Journal
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
4
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.5%
5
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
7
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
8
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
9
Gene
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
10
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
11
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
12
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
13
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
14
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
15
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
16
Molecular Biology Reports
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
FEBS Letters
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Experimental Cell Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Cell Cycle
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
22
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
26
Science Bulletin
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
28
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
29
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
30
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%