Back

Deciphering the role of intrinsically disordered regions of FUS in recognizing U1 snRNA

Mitra, S.; Mahto, F. K.; Maity, A.; Bahadur, R. P.

2026-06-04 biophysics
10.64898/2026.06.03.729848 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) is an RNA-binding protein associated with neurodegenerative disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Along with its structured RNA recognition motif, FUS contains two intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) that play important roles in RNA recognition. However, structural mechanism and dynamics of these IDRs in recognizing RNA remain elusive. We have used molecular dynamics simulations to investigate the structure and dynamics of the two IDRs, flanking the RRM domain of human FUS, in both Apo and U1 snRNA-bound states. Comparison of structural parameters and molecular interactions reveals that RNA binding stabilizes the IDRs and reduces their conformational flexibility through reorganization of intra-protein contacts and correlated movements. RNA binding also causes rearrangement of backbone dihedral angles of the IDRs and limits the formation of secondary structures such as -helices and 310 helices. Interestingly, the two IDRs exhibit distinct modes of RNA recognition. The N-terminal IDR interacts mainly with the nucleotides located near the terminal regions of the stem-loop snRNA. On the other hand, the C-terminal IDR preferentially associates with the central double-stranded region through extensive interactions with the minor groove of the snRNA. Even within IDRs, we identify specific residues that associate with the snRNA more frequently than others by forming persistent hydrogen bonds. Overall, our findings suggest that the flanking disordered regions of FUS are not merely flexible linkers, but actively participate in RNA recognition through distinct interaction mechanisms. These results provide molecular-level insights into the functional roles of IDRs in recognizing stem-loop RNA.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
RNA
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.1%
2
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.9%
3
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.8%
4
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.8%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.7%
7
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
8
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
9
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
11
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.9%
14
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
15
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.1%
17
JACS Au
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
18
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
RNA Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
20
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
21
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
23
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
25
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
27
Journal of Structural Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
28
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%