Scene Structure Predicts Perceptual Decisions in Naturalistic Detection Tasks
Yang, J.; Vercillo, T.; Cutrona, T. E.; Azeglio, S.; Iannetti, G.; Neri, P.
Show abstract
The human visual system can identify objects in complex natural scenes, yet the mechanisms supporting robust perception under such variable conditions remain incompletely understood. Here, we investigate how the statistical structure of natural scenes shapes perceptual evidence formation and determines whether near-threshold stimuli are perceived correctly or incorrectly. We combine controlled psychophysics, outdoor augmented reality (AR), deep neural networks (DNNs), image-feature analysis, and EEG to examine how background context modulates perceptual decisions. Across multiple detection tasks, human performance was systematically influenced by probe-free background structure. DNNs trained on background images alone predicted correct and incorrect behavioral outcomes, with stronger effects in postcue conditions, suggesting that global scene context contributes to local perceptual decisions when spatial uncertainty is higher. AR experiments further showed that these context-driven effects persist in naturalistic viewing environments. To identify the visual information underlying these effects, we analyzed low-level image statistics. Texture entropy and edge density emerged as informative features, and conventional machine-learning models trained on these measures achieved meaningful correct/incorrect classification. Finally, EEG analyses revealed neural signatures of image-driven perceptual variability: activity during the probe-free preimage window distinguished later correct from incorrect trials, and combining EEG with image-derived features improved decoding performance. Together, these findings show that perception in natural scenes is not determined solely by the target, but is shaped by the statistical structure of the surrounding context. By linking psychophysics, AR, DNN modeling, image statistics, and EEG, this work provides a unified framework for understanding how environmental structure and neural dynamics jointly support perceptual decision-making.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Constrained sampling from deep generative image models reveals mechanisms of human target detection 97%
- Deep neural networks trained for estimating albedo and illumination achieve lightness constancy differently than human observers. 94%
- Target Identification Under High Levels of Amplitude, Size, Orientation and Background Uncertainty 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Orthogonal Representations of Object Shape and Category in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks and Human Visual Cortex 95%
- Orthogonal neural representations support perceptual judgements of natural stimuli 95%
- Brain-Guided Convolutional Neural Networks Reveal Task-Specific Representations in Scene Processing 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Conscious perception of natural images is constrained by category-related visual features 94%
- Flexible computation of object motion and depth based on viewing geometry inferred from optic flow 94%
- Unsupervised learning as a computational principle works in visual learning of natural scenes, but not of artificial stimuli 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Small hand-designed convolutional neural networks outperform transfer learning in automated cell shape detection in confluent tissues 94%
- Three-dimensional shape cues affect human and artificial recognition systems differently 93%
- The relationship between confidence and gaze-at-nothing oculomotor dynamics during decision-making 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.