Chemical Mixtures in River Basins: Combining Additive and Independent Effects with Probabilistic Risk Modelling
Moe, S. J.; Madsen, A. L.; Mentzel, S.; Viaene, K. P. J.; Vlaeminck, K.; Grung, M.; Martins, S. E.; Subelj, G.; Welch, S. A.; Verdonck, F.
Show abstract
Chemical mixtures and potential cocktail effects in aquatic ecosystems are recognised as a threat for river basins world-wide. Probabilistic risk approaches are becoming more common in environmental risk assessment, and offer new opportunities for metodological challenges such as of mixture risk characterisation. The Concentration Addition (CA) concept is commonly used in lower-tier risk assessment (e.g., sum of risk quotients), as a pragmatic and protective method. However, the alternative Independent Action (IA) concept can easily be implemented in probabilistic risk calculation (e.g., joint probability of threshold exceedances). We have developed a multi-level probabilistic model for integrating these two concepts, formulated as an object-oriented Bayesian network (BN). First, probabilistic risk quotients (RQ) are calculated for individual substances, as probability distributions of environmental concentrations divided by a threshold environmental value. Next, the CA concept is applied within groups of substances by summing the RQ distributions. Finally, the IA concept is applied across the different substance groups, assuming independent modes of action, to combine RQ distributions by joint probability calculation ("OR" expressions). Predicted exposure concentrations were obtained from the ENCORE fate model, a process-based model for simulation of chemicals in river basins across Europe. Here we present a pilot study focusing on a subset of the substances (15 pesticides) and river basins (in Belgium), as a proof-of-concept. The purpose of this pilot study was to demonstrate a novel probabilistic approach to mixture risk characterisation, by combining the CA and IA concepts in a multi-level BN. The results were consistent across scenarios as well as with literature, with CA-based risk characterisations being slightly higher the IA-based. The combined CA+IA-based risk represents a reasonable compromise. Sensitivity analysis of the BN can provide an effective ranking of the risk-driving substances and groups, to support chemical prioritisation and risk managment. Key pointsO_LIA multi-level Bayesian network (BN) was developed for probabilistic calculation of environmental risk from chemical mixtures, based on risk quotients (RQ) calculated for individual substances, with a selection of 15 pesticides in Belgium as a pilot study. C_LIO_LIPredicted environmental concentrations (PEC) are obtained from the ENCORE exposure model; a process-based model which can simulate transport, fate and concentration of >1000 substances (pesticides, pharmaceuticals, etc.) in rivers subcatchments across Europe based on chemical use and emission. C_LIO_LIThe BNs risk calculation uses substance groups (Fungicides, Herbicides and Insecticides) to combine two classical mixture concepts: (1) Concentration Addition: sum of RQs within groups, followed by (2) Independent Action: joint probability of threshold exceedance for one or more groups. C_LIO_LIThe resulting rankings of risk-driving substances by the BN for this pilot study are robust across scenarios, suggesting a potential for expanding this generic BN approach to different mixtures with higher numbers of substances and groups, and to larger regions of Europe. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A multi-scenario risk assessment strategy applied to mixtures of chemicals of emerging concern in the River Aconcagua basin in Central Chile 96%
- A Bayesian network approach to assess the influence of climate change and pesticide use practices on the ecological risks of pesticides in a protected Mediterranean wetland 96%
- Leveraging regulatory monitoring data for quantitative microbial risk assessment of Legionella pneumophila in cooling towers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining the data gap: what do we know about environmental exposure, hazards and risks of pharmaceuticals in the European aquatic environment? 94%
- Predicting catchment suitability for biodiversity at national scales 94%
- Validity Assessment of Michigan's Proposed qPCR Threshold Value for Rapid Water-Quality Monitoring of E. coli Contamination 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Toxicants Associated with Spontaneous Abortion in the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) 92%
- Non-target Analysis of Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluents: Chemical Fingerprinting as a Monitoring Tool. 91%
- Geospatial approach to investigate spatial clustering and hotspots of blood lead levels in children within Kabwe, Zambia 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Recommendations to address uncertainties in environmental risk assessment using toxicokinetics-toxicodynamics models 96%
- Statistical analysis of three data sources for Covid-19 monitoring in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany 94%
- Risks of exposure to systemic insecticides in agricultural soil in Ontario, Canada for the hoary squash bee (Peponapis pruinosa) and other ground-nesting bee species 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.