Back

USP7 sustains PAX3::FOXO1 enhancer reprogramming and represents a therapeutic vulnerability in Rhabdomyosarcoma

Taboas, P.; Blanco, E.; Prada, E.; Faehling, T.; Sanchez-Jimenez, M.; Rios-Astorch, C.; Baulenas-Farres, M.; Estrada-Bes, B.; Cuadros-Hernandez, X.; Mateo-Lozano, S.; Gomez-Gonzalez, S.; Perez-Jaume, S.; Lavarino, C.; Grünewald, T. G. P.; Cidre-Aranaz, F.; Mora, J.; Di Croce, L.; Sanchez-Molina, S.

2026-06-08 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.06.03.724934 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children and is often associated with dismal outcomes, underscoring the urgent need for new therapeutic strategies. RMS arises from embryonic skeletal muscle precursor cells that fail to complete the myogenic differentiation program. Fusion-positive rhabdomyosarcoma (FP-RMS), defined by the presence of recurrent gene fusions such as PAX3::FOXO1 or PAX7::FOXO1, is associated with the poorest overall survival. The encoded fusion oncoprotein cause epigenetic reprogramming that defines the biology and behavior of FP-RMS. Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1)-mediated chromatin regulation contributes to the control of developmental gene programs. Here, we investigate the dependency of RMS on epigenetic remodeling mediated by the PRC1.1 subunits ubiquitin specific protease 7 (USP7) and really interesting new gene 1B (RING1B). We found that USP7 is overexpressed in RMS samples, and that high expression correlates with poor patient prognosis. USP7 and RING1B bind to H3K27ac-enriched regions and colocalize with PAX3::FOXO1 at active enhancers controlling key tumorigenic genes in FP-RMS. Moreover, both shRNA-mediated depletion and pharmacological inhibition of USP7 downregulate PAX3::FOXO1 enhancer-driven genes, induce skeletal muscle differentiation and significantly inhibit FP-RMS tumor growth in vivo. Altogether, our findings identify USP7 as a critical regulator of PAX3::FOXO1-bound enhancers and highlight a novel therapeutic opportunity in RMS based on epigenetic dependencies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 13%
13.1%
2
Oncogene
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.8%
4
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
5
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
6
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.3%
8
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
9
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.4%
10
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
11
EMBO Molecular Medicine
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.8%
13
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Molecular Cancer
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
15
Molecular and Cellular Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
16
Molecular Cancer Research
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
18
Cell Death & Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.1%
20
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
21
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
Molecular Therapy Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.0%
24
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
Epigenetics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
NAR Cancer
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
27
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.6%
28
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%