Hemorrhagic Transformation After Endovascular Thrombectomy in Young Adults: A Prediction Model
Lv, Q.; Yuan, K.; Liao, A.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Xiao, G.; Liu, W.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, D.; Huang, K.; Chen, C.; Dong, W.; Pan, L.; Zhu, W.; Liu, X.
Show abstract
Background and Purpose: Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) is a serious complication of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), yet dedicated prediction models for young adults are lacking. We aimed to develop and externally validate a simplified risk score for HT in young adults with acute ischemic stroke undergoing EVT. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included patients aged 18 to 49 years with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who underwent EVT. The primary outcome was any HT within 24 hours after EVT. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of HT, from which the NO?PAIN Score was derived. External validation was performed in an independent cohort of 138 patients. Results: Among 598 patients in the derivation cohort, HT occurred in 176 (29.4%). Five independent predictors were identified: admission NIHSS, number of thrombectomy passes, atrial fibrillation, alcohol consumption, and mTICI grade. The mTICI grade demonstrated a non-linear, inverted U-shaped relationship with HT risk, peaking at partial recanalization. The NO-PAIN Score showed acceptable discrimination in both the derivation (C-index, 0.737; optimism-corrected C-index, 0.748) and external validation cohorts (C-index, 0.726), with satisfactory calibration. Conclusions: The NO-PAIN Score is a simple risk prediction tool for HT after EVT in young adults with acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. It may assist in individualized risk stratification in this population.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Adjunctive Intra-arterial Urokinase after Successful Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke (POST-UK): Study protocol of a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial 97%
- Large Core Thrombectomy: Feasibility Of Simplified Protocol In Resource-Limited Settings 96%
- Computed tomography perfusion parameters predictive of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy in patients with cerebral large vessel occlusion 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Combined Thrombectomy and Intravenous Thrombolysis in Tandem Lesions 98%
- Early recanalization among patients undergoing bridging therapy with tenecteplase or alteplase 97%
- Improvement in Delivery of Ischemic Stroke Treatments but Stagnation of Clinical Outcomes in Young Adults in South Korea 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intravenous Thrombolysis before Thrombectomy Improves Functional Outcome after Stroke Independent of Reperfusion Grade 98%
- Deviation From Personalized Blood Pressure Targets Correlates With Worse Outcome After Successful Recanalization 96%
- Tenecteplase 0.4 mg/kg in moderate and severe acute ischemic stroke: A pooled analysis of NOR-TEST & NOR-TEST 2A 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- White matter lesions as a prognostic marker of recurrence in cryptogenic stroke with high-risk patent foramen ovale 97%
- Modified Rankin Scale Disability Status at Day 4 Poststroke is an Informative Predictor of Long-Term Day 90 Outcome 95%
- Impact of Fludrocortisone on the Outcomes of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: A Retrospective Analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Identification of Thrombectomy Amenable Vessel Occlusion on Computed Tomography Angiography using Deep Learning 97%
- Workflow Intervals andOutcomesof Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large-Vessel Occlusion During On- Versus Off-Hours in China The ANGEL-ACT Registry 96%
- Endovascular thrombectomy: an effective and safe therapy for perioperative ischemic stroke 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.