An AI-assisted feasibility evaluation of three photoplethysmography-derived microvascular reactivity signals in MIMIC-IV-WDB v0.1.0
Landry, T. C.; Kim, Y.
Show abstract
Background. Capillary refill time, an examiner-dependent bedside test of distal microvascular perfusion, has become a resuscitation target in septic shock,1,2,3,4 motivating a continuous surrogate computed from the photoplethysmogram (PPG, the optical waveform the pulse oximeter on every ICU patient already records).5,6,7,8 Objective. We attempted three PPG-derived candidate measures on the MIMIC-IV Waveform Database (MIMIC-IV-WDB v0.1.0) and asked, by inspecting randomly drawn examples, whether each captured its intended physiology before any downstream modeling. Methods. MIMIC-IV-WDB v0.1.09 was linked to MIMIC-IV.10 The signals were a cuff-anchored perfusion-index recovery (reactive hyperemia when the cuff shares an arm with the probe), a slow Mayer-wave-band power ratio of the perfusion index (sympathetic vasomotor tone), and a per-beat diastolic exponential decay time constant (a refill-like recovery time). For each signal we drew 10 random examples at a fixed seed and checked them against a checklist fixed in advance. Each was read by the author and, separately, by MedGemma 1.5, a multimodal medical language model run locally. A synthetic test with a known time constant checked the third signal. Results. The cuff-anchored signal showed the expected occlusion-reperfusion shape on 268 of 6,236 evaluable cuff cycles (4.30%) in 15 of 19 patients, consistent with opposite-limb placement of the probe and cuff. The slow-band ratio returned a stable cohort value, but a clear, stationary peak appeared in only4 of 10 random windows. The per-beat fit met its goodness-of-fit threshold in 10 of 10 beats, yet a cardiac-frequency heuristic flagged a possible fit on the heart-rate oscillation in 7 of 10, and in 5 of 17 patients the time constant lay where an exponential is indistinguishable from a straight line. A 0.5Hz high-pass pre-filter implanted its own approximately 318 ms time constant regardless of truth. The language model tracked the human on clear positives but reported the pattern present on every call it returned, never absent. Conclusions. Two of the three candidate signals did not reflect their intended physiology in most examples, and the third was constrained by sensor placement. Inspecting a few random raw inputs against a checklist written in advance is an inexpensive upstream check before downstream inference on PPG-derived microvascular signals.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Detecting QT prolongation From a Single-lead ECG With Deep Learning 93%
- Identification of physiological adverse events using continuous vital signs monitoring during paediatric critical care transport: a novel data-driven approach 93%
- QRS detection in single-lead, telehealth electrocardiogram signals: benchmarking open-source algorithms 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning Prediction of Biomarkers from Echocardiogram Videos 94%
- Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Comprehensive Assessment of the Aortic Valve Stenosis Continuum in Echocardiography 92%
- Predicting the functional effects of voltage-gated potassium channel missense variants with multi-task learning 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Age Prediction From 12-lead Electrocardiograms Using Deep Learning: A Comparison of Four Models on a Contemporary, Freely Available Dataset 94%
- Classification of 12-lead ECGs: the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2020 91%
- High-Fidelity Measurement of Pulse Arrival Time in Critically Ill Children Using Standard Bedside Monitoring Equipment 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Explaining Deep Neural Networks for Knowledge Discovery in Electrocardiogram Analysis 95%
- DeepFake electrocardiograms: the beginning of the end for privacy issues in medicine 93%
- A comprehensive stroke risk assessment by combining atrial computational fluid dynamics simulations and functional patient data 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.