Back

An AI-assisted feasibility evaluation of three photoplethysmography-derived microvascular reactivity signals in MIMIC-IV-WDB v0.1.0

Landry, T. C.; Kim, Y.

2026-06-06 health informatics
10.64898/2026.06.03.26354863 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. Capillary refill time, an examiner-dependent bedside test of distal microvascular perfusion, has become a resuscitation target in septic shock,1,2,3,4 motivating a continuous surrogate computed from the photoplethysmogram (PPG, the optical waveform the pulse oximeter on every ICU patient already records).5,6,7,8 Objective. We attempted three PPG-derived candidate measures on the MIMIC-IV Waveform Database (MIMIC-IV-WDB v0.1.0) and asked, by inspecting randomly drawn examples, whether each captured its intended physiology before any downstream modeling. Methods. MIMIC-IV-WDB v0.1.09 was linked to MIMIC-IV.10 The signals were a cuff-anchored perfusion-index recovery (reactive hyperemia when the cuff shares an arm with the probe), a slow Mayer-wave-band power ratio of the perfusion index (sympathetic vasomotor tone), and a per-beat diastolic exponential decay time constant (a refill-like recovery time). For each signal we drew 10 random examples at a fixed seed and checked them against a checklist fixed in advance. Each was read by the author and, separately, by MedGemma 1.5, a multimodal medical language model run locally. A synthetic test with a known time constant checked the third signal. Results. The cuff-anchored signal showed the expected occlusion-reperfusion shape on 268 of 6,236 evaluable cuff cycles (4.30%) in 15 of 19 patients, consistent with opposite-limb placement of the probe and cuff. The slow-band ratio returned a stable cohort value, but a clear, stationary peak appeared in only4 of 10 random windows. The per-beat fit met its goodness-of-fit threshold in 10 of 10 beats, yet a cardiac-frequency heuristic flagged a possible fit on the heart-rate oscillation in 7 of 10, and in 5 of 17 patients the time constant lay where an exponential is indistinguishable from a straight line. A 0.5Hz high-pass pre-filter implanted its own approximately 318 ms time constant regardless of truth. The language model tracked the human on clear positives but reported the pattern present on every call it returned, never absent. Conclusions. Two of the three candidate signals did not reflect their intended physiology in most examples, and the third was constrained by sensor placement. Inspecting a few random raw inputs against a checklist written in advance is an inexpensive upstream check before downstream inference on PPG-derived microvascular signals.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
9.1%
2
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.4%
3
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.9%
5
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
8
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
9
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.3%
12
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
14
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
15
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
20
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
22
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.9%
24
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
26
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
27
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
30
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.6%