Back

Assessing the impact of absence of coordination in malaria intervention strategies: a modelling study

Iggidr, Y.; Ruktanonchai, N. W.; Benhana, B.; Turbe, V.; Bauzile, B.; Ward, A.; Cohen, J.; Pothin, E.; Champagne, C.

2026-06-05 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.06.03.26354857 medRxiv
Show abstract

Malaria control programs are increasingly tailored at subnational scales; however, neighboring areas remain connected through human mobility, allowing parasite importation that may undermine independently timed interventions. Although the spatial targeting of control has been the focus of extensive research, the epidemiological consequences of temporal misalignment in intervention deployment across interconnected regions remain to be elucidated. We investigate how asynchronous timing of malaria interventions affects transmission dynamics using a two-patch susceptible-infected-susceptible metapopulation model. We compare synchronous and asynchronous intervention schedules and quantify their impact using measures of excess cumulative incidence attributable to asynchrony. The measure that will be used for this purpose is referred to as Asynchrony Induced Growth (AIG). Across a range of 10,000 parameter combinations, asynchronous implementation has been observed to result in a heightened incidence compared to synchronized deployment, though the impact is typically negligible in most endemic settings. Sensitivity analyses indicate that the impact is most significant when interventions are highly effective, infectious duration is brief, and transmission intensity approaches the elimination threshold. In such circumstances, asynchrony has the potential to substantially inflate case numbers, delay transmission interruption, or even prevent elimination entirely. In illustrative scenarios that reflect realistic settings, synchronizing interventions has been shown to avert large numbers of infections and shorten elimination timelines by years to decades. These findings demonstrate that, beyond spatial targeting, temporal coordination of interventions across connected areas can meaningfully enhance malaria control and elimination. Coordinated timing may be particularly valuable for cross-border or near-elimination programs and should be considered in operational planning and resource allocation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.6%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.8%
3
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
5
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.0%
6
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
8
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
9
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
11
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
13
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.0%
18
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
19
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
22
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
23
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%