Assessing the impact of absence of coordination in malaria intervention strategies: a modelling study
Iggidr, Y.; Ruktanonchai, N. W.; Benhana, B.; Turbe, V.; Bauzile, B.; Ward, A.; Cohen, J.; Pothin, E.; Champagne, C.
Show abstract
Malaria control programs are increasingly tailored at subnational scales; however, neighboring areas remain connected through human mobility, allowing parasite importation that may undermine independently timed interventions. Although the spatial targeting of control has been the focus of extensive research, the epidemiological consequences of temporal misalignment in intervention deployment across interconnected regions remain to be elucidated. We investigate how asynchronous timing of malaria interventions affects transmission dynamics using a two-patch susceptible-infected-susceptible metapopulation model. We compare synchronous and asynchronous intervention schedules and quantify their impact using measures of excess cumulative incidence attributable to asynchrony. The measure that will be used for this purpose is referred to as Asynchrony Induced Growth (AIG). Across a range of 10,000 parameter combinations, asynchronous implementation has been observed to result in a heightened incidence compared to synchronized deployment, though the impact is typically negligible in most endemic settings. Sensitivity analyses indicate that the impact is most significant when interventions are highly effective, infectious duration is brief, and transmission intensity approaches the elimination threshold. In such circumstances, asynchrony has the potential to substantially inflate case numbers, delay transmission interruption, or even prevent elimination entirely. In illustrative scenarios that reflect realistic settings, synchronizing interventions has been shown to avert large numbers of infections and shorten elimination timelines by years to decades. These findings demonstrate that, beyond spatial targeting, temporal coordination of interventions across connected areas can meaningfully enhance malaria control and elimination. Coordinated timing may be particularly valuable for cross-border or near-elimination programs and should be considered in operational planning and resource allocation.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling to explore the potential impact of asymptomatic human infections on transmission and dynamics of African sleeping sickness 96%
- Spatial modelling for population replacement of mosquito vectors at continental scale 95%
- Vector genetics, insecticide resistance and gene drives: an agent-based modeling approach to evaluate malaria transmission and elimination 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling the Test, Trace and Quarantine Strategy to Control the COVID-19 Epidemic in the State of São Paulo, Brazil 95%
- A Metapopulation Network Model for the Spreading of SARS-CoV-2: Case Study for Ireland 95%
- Estimate of the rate of unreported COVID-19 cases during the first outbreak in Rio de Janeiro 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of human mobility and reactive case detection on malaria transmission in Zanzibar 95%
- Accurate forecasts of the effectiveness of interventions against Ebola may require models that account for variations in symptoms during infection 94%
- The COVID-19 vaccination campaign in Switzerland and its impact on disease spread 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Model reduction and analysis: A case study of a malaria control model 95%
- Uncertainty Quantification in Cost-effectiveness Analysis for Stochastic-based Infectious Disease Models: Insights from Surveillance on Lymphatic Filariasis 94%
- How optimal allocation of limited testing capacity changes epidemic dynamics 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.